Technical Specifications Comparison Table of Sony a6400 and a6300

Sony a6400 vs a6300 Camera Comparison
The A6400 shares a lot with the model it replaces (Sony has confirmed it replaces the a6300). Both feature a 24MP APS-C sensor, 4K video, and 11fps continuous shooting capability. They share the same viewfinder and mostly the same hardware. So, what sets them apart?
The immediate difference is the rear touchscreen that can tilt 180 degrees, enabling touch focus, convenient for selfies and vlogging (although the screen may be obstructed when a microphone is plugged into the hot shoe).
Next significant difference lies in autofocus performance and operation. Tests have shown that the AF of a6400 is simpler to use. Due to its tighter and more consistent focus, you can employ Real-time Tracking mode for all types of subjects without needing to switch modes. It also offers Eye AF without requiring a second button press and is intelligent enough to automatically switch to tracking an unspecified subject if the eyes or face disappear, then revert when they reappear.
The new processor, likely more efficient, carries fewer risks of overheating during video recording. Unlike its predecessors, a6400 isn't constrained by the 29:59 minute recording time limit; in the latest trials, it managed over 45 minutes of continuous recording.
Comparison between Sony a6400 and a6500 Cameras: Which One to Buy?
Conclusion: Is Sony a6400 or a6300 Worth Buying?
Despite its lower price, a6300 remains a fairly user-friendly model, though it may lack some of the modern technological upgrades found in a6400. As for a6400, it embodies modernity and the world's fastest autofocus capability, surely making it hard to resist. Thus, every camera has its reasons for ownership, and the final decision still depends on you.
Review of Sony's World's Fastest Autofocus Mirrorless Camera, the a6400