Buzz
We’ve all heard the terrifying accounts of individuals who go out for a night in a new city, only to wake up in a freezing bathtub full of ice, their body marked with a large scar. It's then they realize with horror that their kidney has been taken. While these kinds of stories do happen, they pale in comparison to the real nightmare of organ trafficking.
Illegal organ trade is far more widespread, profitable, and exploitative than most people realize. Those responsible for trafficking organs almost never face any consequences. Tragically, for many individuals, this black market is the only option to avoid death while waiting for a legal transplant.
10. As Much As 10% Of Organ Transplants Happen Illegally
The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that over 100,000 organ transplants take place globally every year. However, due to various factors like government policies, personal views on organ donation, and challenges in harvesting organs safely and swiftly, we need over ten times the number of donations to satisfy worldwide demand.
Naturally, when supply can't meet demand, people turn to illegal methods. Due to the vast gap between the need for organs and the available supply, the WHO estimates that five to ten percent of all organ transplants worldwide are conducted illegally. Of these, 75 percent involve kidneys, the most highly demanded organ.
9. Financial Impact
As with any black market, there is a premium for transplants that happen outside the law. Despite the added risks of illegal surgeries, many patients desperate for an organ transplant are faced with the grim reality of dying before ever getting to the top of a legal donor list. This desperation allows traffickers to demand sky-high prices, fueling the global underground organ trade, which generates between $600 million and $1.2 billion annually.
The individuals who sell their organs often come from impoverished areas, such as the slums of Manila, the capital of the Philippines. If they are actually paid the promised amount, it rarely exceeds $5,000. In contrast, buyers from wealthier nations like the US and Japan may pay as much as $200,000 per organ, with traffickers pocketing the difference.
8. The Economics of Supply and Demand
Not all organs hold the same value. The price of an organ depends on factors like its likelihood of failure, how easily it can be harvested and transplanted, and whether it is possible for someone to survive donating it. Kidneys, making up the bulk of organ transplants—both legal and illegal—are highly valued. This is because they can easily be damaged by lifestyle choices like drinking, yet they can also be donated without harming the donor’s quality of life. This makes the price of a kidney hover around $150,000.
Livers come close in price to kidneys, despite being in less demand, because only a part of the liver needs to be donated. Both the donor's and recipient's portions will regenerate within eight weeks. Bones and ligaments are relatively cheaper at $5,000, while a cornea transplant is priced around $20,000. As expected, the most expensive organs are the lungs and heart, with prices reaching up to $300,000 and $500,000, respectively.
7. Vulnerable Targets
$5,000 may not seem like much for an organ, but for many, it represents an unattainable sum. This reality makes vulnerable individuals the prime targets for traffickers. These people are not only easier to coerce into selling their organs but are also more likely to be exploited, with traffickers underpaying or stealing from them altogether. Those who are poorer and more vulnerable often lack the resources or governmental support to ensure fair transactions.
A notable example of this comes from Spain, where in 2012, an unnamed woman advertised her kidney online after consulting with a doctor in Morocco. She later updated her post, offering to sell a lung, part of her liver, and her corneas as well. Despite the risk of a 12-year prison sentence if caught, the disabled single mother desperately needed money to support her daughter. Her disability benefits were insufficient to cover her rent, which was owed to an abusive ex-boyfriend. This situation starkly demonstrates the grave risks of organ trafficking, even in seemingly safe and respectable countries.
6. Black Market Magic
In 2013, one of the largest hospitals in Swaziland found itself at the center of a major scandal. Employees at Raleigh Fitkin Memorial Hospital were accused of running an underground organ trade, allegedly selling organs to buyers from neighboring countries. This was all done for a practice known as muti, a form of traditional Sub-Saharan medicine, often referred to as magic.
Muti is believed to be most potent when using freshly removed body parts, and although murders committed for muti purposes do occur, they often go untracked. Since repeatedly committing murders would attract unwanted attention, it is alleged that hospital staff began harvesting organs from recently deceased patients and selling them for use in creams, potions, and powders. The high demand for fresh body parts in the region has also led to a rise in grave robbing, with the dead often stripped of their eyes, hands, and genitals.
5. The Iranian Model
The issue of black market organ transplantation poses significant challenges to many individuals. Vulnerable populations, such as those residing in impoverished rural areas, are particularly exploited. People are murdered, or graves are desecrated. Both donors and recipients face serious health risks. Moreover, with only about ten percent of the global demand for organs being met, the problem of black market organs seems nearly impossible to solve.
For these reasons, many experts support the Iranian model. Around 30 years ago, Iran saw a sharp rise in the number of people suffering from severe kidney-related diseases. As treatment options failed and costs escalated, the government began compensating relatives who donated kidneys, and arranged for the surgeries to be done abroad. While the program helped reduce patient deaths, costs continued to climb. As a result, Iran established its own organ donation service, with donation centers across the country. They followed up with legislation that allowed unrelated individuals to donate, although the recipients were not allowed to choose the organ recipient.
Within a year, the number of donations doubled, with most of them coming from unrelated donors. Donors were compensated with payments, free healthcare, and improved post-surgery care for everyone involved. The government also took significant measures to combat transplant tourism by preventing foreigners from entering the country to receive an Iranian kidney, restricting donations to refugees and vulnerable individuals within their own communities, and outlawing any payment to hospital staff or intermediaries.
One of the most intriguing outcomes is the fact that there are no significant demographic disparities between the donor and recipient groups. This means that both the wealthy and powerful, as well as the weak and vulnerable, are equally involved in donating and receiving organs. Another interesting point is that in Iran, only ten percent of donations come from deceased individuals, compared to 60 percent in the United States. Despite this, Iran still receives a considerable number of cadaveric donations, in addition to a large volume of living donations.
4. Child Trafficking
Organ transplantation is not merely about finding a willing donor; it also involves identifying one that is compatible. This goes beyond having the correct blood type and often requires the donor to be of similar age and size to the recipient. Unfortunately, this is how innocent children fall victim to the illegal organ trade.
Organ trafficking is a global issue, but Mozambique’s northern town of Nampula is perhaps the most notorious. Nuns from the Sisters Servants of Mary Immaculate, who have operated an orphanage there for over three decades, claim to have witnessed the devastating impacts of this trade firsthand. In addition to speaking with escapees and reviewing photographic evidence, the nuns say they’ve seen repeated attempts to abduct children from the orphanage and have cared for orphans whose organs were removed (some of whom died afterward). The nuns even received death threats from traffickers, and locals suspect the police are involved in covering up the crimes.
3. A Global Concern
Many traffickers deceive themselves into thinking that organ trafficking is a crime without victims: the sick benefit with transplants, the poor earn money, and the middleman makes a living by facilitating the transactions. However, most people recognize that unwilling donors are victims, and many recipients end up with substandard organs that endanger their lives. The truth is that the black market for organs is a crisis that affects us all.
In the United States, about 120,000 individuals are on the waiting list for organ transplants, and every ten minutes, one more person is added to that list. Tragically, 22 people die every day while waiting. However, a single organ donor can save up to eight lives. If the donor also gives tissues, they could help as many as 75 people. With a population of over 320 million, is it really so difficult to find three more donors each day?
The answer is unequivocally no. Yet, despite the vast majority of Americans being eligible, only 42 percent are registered organ donors. The grim truth is that the black market for organs persists because both governments and individuals repeatedly fail to take meaningful steps to address this problem.
In 2015, Wales passed a law that operates under an opt-out system, meaning everyone is assumed to be an organ donor unless they explicitly choose not to be. This eliminates bureaucratic hurdles and ensures organs are retrieved before they lose their viability. In the year that followed, organ donations in Wales increased by 10 percent, compared to just 4 percent across the rest of the UK. Only 6 percent of people opted out. More than 24 countries now have presumed consent laws, which have led to donation rates rising up to 30 percent higher than those with an opt-in approach. While organ traffickers commit monstrous crimes, we must ask: When will our governments seize control of this trade, and until then, where do I sign up?
2. War Crimes
Traffickers typically target the poorest and most vulnerable individuals for two key reasons: They are more likely to part with their organs for a lower price, and law enforcement is less likely to intervene. However, when the number of victims reaches a critical mass, public outrage forces traffickers to relocate. In instances where large numbers of impoverished and vulnerable individuals are dying or disappearing—such as during wars or refugee crises—the crime is much easier to conceal.
In 2015, the bodies of nine Somali citizens were discovered on a beach in Egypt. Initially thought to be refugees who had drowned at sea, the distinctive scars on their bodies indicated their organs had been harvested. Following the 2004 tsunami, a slum in India became infamous as 'Kidneyville,' where doctors would refuse to treat patients unless they could pay, often by providing healthy organs.
Another instance involves the Kosovo Liberation Army, which faced accusations of harvesting organs from Serbian adversaries following the conclusion of the Kosovo War. These allegations, raised by journalists and investigated by the EU, prompted the establishment of a new court. This court will examine claims of war crimes, particularly those in which defendants are accused of 'subjecting persons who are in the power of an adverse party to physical mutilation or to medical or scientific experiments of any kind which are neither justified by medical, dental or hospital treatment.'
1. Smaller Circles
Not all cases of organ trafficking involve large-scale conspiracies with international actors attempting to abduct or bribe vulnerable individuals. In some cases, it can involve much smaller groups, with organ removal occurring without the knowledge or consent of the donors or their families. These instances are inherently more difficult to detect, but one of the most disturbing examples uncovered was the case of Ruben Navarro.
In January 2006, Ruben Navarro, a 25-year-old, was admitted to Sierra Vista Regional Medical Center in California. Diagnosed with the neurological disorder adrenoleukodystrophy, Ruben’s physical and mental health deteriorated over time until January 29, when he was found unconscious. His mother, living on disability benefits, was informed that her son was unlikely to recover. Later that night, she received a call asking her to consent to register him as an organ donor. She agreed.
A few days later, the decision was made to turn off his life support. Dr. Hootan C. Roozrokh, Ruben’s treating physician, was accused of directing a nurse to administer 'candy' after Ruben continued to survive without a ventilator. With the transplant team present in the room (which violated protocol), morphine, anti-anxiety medication, and antiseptic were injected into Ruben’s body to hasten his death. Despite these efforts, Ruben survived for another eight hours, and his organs could not ultimately be harvested.
Despite considerable suspicious behavior, Dr. Roozrokh was acquitted of all charges. His trial marked the first of its kind in the United States, although there are numerous allegations of deceased individuals having their organs removed without consent. In many instances, however, the body is cremated, making it impossible to uncover the truth.
