Buzz
Mastering a foreign language is a challenging yet deeply rewarding journey that many undertake over years. However, numerous peculiar and unfounded beliefs persist about the world's languages. Below, we explore 10 of the most persistent myths.
10. Japanese Is Often Seen as Unique and Unlearnable
A longstanding belief among many Japanese is that their language is uniquely complex and inherently incomprehensible to non-natives. This idea is rooted in “Nihonjinron” (Japanese Theory), which asserts the distinctiveness of Japanese culture and people, setting them apart from the rest of the world. According to this theory, the Japanese language is homogeneous, deeply intertwined with the nation's race and culture, and possesses a spiritual connection to its people. Common sentiments include: “The language barrier explains most of the enigma surrounding Asia,” and “Even those who manage to learn Japanese through immense mental effort often find their endeavors ultimately futile.”
Most claims made by Nihonjinron are easily debunked. Japanese is far from homogeneous; it encompasses numerous dialects, a natural outcome for a nation of mountainous islands. The standard language, hyojungo, was initially modeled after the Tokyo dialect, but even Tokyo has since developed its unique linguistic style. Japanese isn’t an isolated language either: the Ryukyuan language spoken in Okinawa is entirely incomprehensible to Japanese speakers and retains elements of Old Japanese from before its divergence in the sixth century AD. The notion that Japanese is unique often arises from comparing it to European languages and marveling at the differences. Yet, when viewed alongside global languages, Japanese linguistic structures are far from extraordinary. While written Japanese poses challenges due to its four writing systems (kanji, hiragana, katakana, and romaji [Roman letters]), spoken Japanese is relatively straightforward, thanks to consistent grammar rules, efficient vocabulary, and the cultural perception that pausing mid-conversation to recall a word appears thoughtful rather than awkward.
9. French Is Often Considered More Logical
The belief that French is a clearer and more logical language has been promoted for centuries, primarily by the French themselves. In 1647, the renowned French grammarian Claude Favre de Vaugelas stated, “We follow the exact order of logical thought in everything we say, which mirrors the order of Nature.” This idea suggests that French grammar embodies a natural logic and clarity, unlike other languages, including Latin, which were seen as ambiguous and imprecise. Some linguists even viewed the intricate perfection of French as a reflection of civilization itself. This sentiment has been embraced by both the French and Francophiles worldwide, as evidenced by rapper MC Solaar’s song “Pour la beaute de la langue francaise.”
However, this notion is flawed because human language is linear, while human logic and perception are not. For instance, when we see a bear eating a taco, we perceive it as a complete concept, not as a sequence of subject (bear)—verb (eat)—object (taco). Any language can convey ideas logically and clearly, and any language, including French, can be expressed incoherently, as anyone who has interacted with vendors selling cheap souvenirs under the Eiffel Tower can confirm.
8. Chinese Characters Are Often Misunderstood as Ideograms
An ideogram is a symbol that conveys an idea directly, bypassing spoken language, such as a “No Smoking” sign or a skull and crossbones. For centuries, European scholars believed Chinese characters functioned this way. Jesuit missionary Matteo Ricci described Chinese writing as “resembling Egyptian hieroglyphs, with each word represented by its own unique symbol.” This led to the belief that Chinese characters could be universally understood by anyone familiar with the symbols, transcending language barriers and delivering pure meaning through visual imagery. While this idea fascinated linguists and philosophers, it oversimplified Chinese characters, often conflating them with misconceptions about Egyptian hieroglyphs.
Writing cannot be entirely divorced from speech and still convey complex ideas effectively. Chinese characters consist of phonetic and semantic components. Phonetic components hint at pronunciation, while semantic components suggest meaning. Characters lacking these elements constitute only about 15 percent of the total and are typically used as phonetic elements in other characters.
The notion that Chinese characters serve as a universal communication tool is overstated. While characters can sometimes bridge communication gaps between speakers of different Chinese dialects, variations in vocabulary limit their effectiveness. The simplification of characters and the focus on putonghua, the Beijing-based standard language, have widened the divide between written Chinese and regional dialects. Cross-linguistically, the challenges are even greater: A character meaning “mother” in Chinese signifies “daughter” in Japanese. For multi-character words, the differences are stark: A term combining characters for “hand” and “paper” translates to tegami (letter) in Japanese but shouzhi (toilet paper) in Chinese.
7. Welsh Is Often Misjudged as Unpronounceable and Outdated
Welsh is frequently the butt of English jokes, portrayed as a dying language with too few vowels and impossible to speak without excessive spitting. Former BBC personality Jeremy Clarkson once quipped, “What’s the purpose of Welsh? It’s just a rallying point for nationalistic fervor among a few hotheads,” and added, “If a group of pale, ginger-haired separatists want to chat in their native tongue, that’s their business, but for the rest of us, it’s confusing and even hazardous. A sign reading ‘gyrrwch yn ofalus’ (Please drive slowly) is usually noticed only after you’ve already sped through the village.” This attitude isn’t new; in 1749, English traveler John Torbuck remarked that Welsh was “a language unfit for human speech, as evidenced by a companion who nearly choked on a Welsh polysyllable until we thumped his back, forcing him to expel a few guttural sounds and saving his life.”
In reality, Welsh, or Cymraeg, is a phonetic language with consistent spelling rules once understood. The term “Welsh” itself is of Germanic origin, meaning “foreigner.” While English spelling is notoriously irregular, Welsh only seems daunting to English speakers because it operates on different linguistic principles, which are, in fact, far more straightforward to master.
The claim that Welsh lacks vowels is misleading, as it actually has seven distinct vowels, compared to English’s five. The famously long and complex place names stem from a cultural preference for descriptive naming. For instance, the village of Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch translates to “The Church of St. Mary by the pool with the white hazel near the fierce whirlpool by St. Tysilio’s church and the red cave.” This lengthy name, however, was a 19th-century publicity stunt to create the longest train station name in the British Isles and now holds the title for the longest URL. Originally, the village was simply called Llanfairpwllgwyngyll, meaning “St Mary’s Church In The Hollow Of The White Hazels,” and pronounced “thlann vyre pooth.”
6. Ebonics Is Often Mislabeled as Lazy English
Many Americans, particularly white individuals, dismiss Ebonics, or African American Vernacular English (AAVE), as merely poor grammar, careless pronunciation, and slang. In 1996, when an Oakland, California, school attempted to recognize AAVE as a distinct dialect for educational purposes, it sparked widespread outrage. Critics, including The Economist, which referred to it as “The Ebonics Outbreak” (a tasteless nod to the Ebola virus outbreak in Zaire), were appalled by the idea of teaching what they deemed an “inferior” form of English. However, linguistically, there is no basis to claim that Standard English is superior to AAVE.
AAVE possesses consistent grammatical and phonetic rules, establishing it as a legitimate dialect of English. Critics often cite double negatives, such as “I ain’t got none,” as evidence of its inferiority, yet overlook their use in languages like French (“Je n‘en ai pas”). AAVE even includes grammatical features absent in Standard English, such as the imperfect tense, which conveys habitual actions or states. For example, “He crazy, but he don’t be crazy” translates to “He is currently acting crazy, but he’s not usually crazy” in Standard English. While these structures may seem incorrect to Standard English speakers, linguists have identified the unique grammatical rules of AAVE, proving it is not “bad English” but rather a distinct variety of English.
Contrary to the belief that students should only learn in the standard dialect, research indicates this approach isn’t the most effective. Studies in Sweden and Norway have demonstrated that teaching in vernacular languages, such as Ebonics or nonstandard Swedish and Norwegian, enables students to read more quickly and retain information more effectively compared to instruction solely in the standard dialect.
5. France Isn’t the Most Protective of Its Language
While the French Academy is often highlighted for its efforts to curb the influence of Franglais and American cultural imports, such as banning the word “hashtag,” France isn’t the most protective of its language within the Francophone world. That distinction belongs to Quebec, where laws mandate workers’ rights to communicate in French and require companies with over 100 employees to establish a “Frenchification committee.” In France, although a branch of the Ministry of Culture proposes French alternatives to foreign words, these suggestions aren’t legally binding. Meanwhile, many other nations enforce their own language protection policies. For instance, 35 U.S. states have designated English as the official language due to concerns over the rise of Spanish.
Iceland has practiced linguistic purism since 1780, requiring the adaptation of foreign words into Icelandic. This is achieved through several methods: Calquing, which combines native roots to mirror foreign words (e.g., rafmagn [electricity] from “amber” and “power”); formal hybridity, blending native and foreign roots; phonosemantic matching, aligning foreign words with native terms of similar sound and meaning (e.g., eydni [AIDS] from eyda [to destroy]); and reviving obsolete words with new meanings. Examples include tolva (computer), merging “number” with an ancient term for “soothsayer,” and flugfreyja (stewardess), combining “fly” with the name of the Norse goddess Freya. This policy allows Icelandic schoolchildren to easily understand 12th-century Viking sagas.
Meanwhile, North Korea prohibited most foreign terms and the use of Chinese characters after 1949, criticizing South Korea’s language for its borrowings from English and Japanese, as well as its “nasal twangs” allegedly used by women to flirt. South Koreans ridicule the North’s awkward attempts to avoid foreign words, such as bulal, which means “light bulb” in the North but “testicle” in the South. The linguistic divide has grown so pronounced that Northerners relocating to the South often require language tutoring to adapt.
4. The Myth of the Spanish King’s Lisp
A notable distinction between Castilian Spanish from Spain and Latin American Spanish is the use of the “th” sound (zeta) for words starting with “c” or “z.” In Latin America, these words are pronounced with an “s.” A popular myth claims this difference arose from a king’s lisp, often attributed to Alfonso X or Felipe II. While this tale is amusing and widely shared in U.S. Spanish classes and comedy routines, it’s entirely false. For instance, the “s” sound still exists in Peninsular Spanish, and the “th” sound is only used for specific letters, making the lisp theory illogical.
In medieval Spain, “c” was pronounced “ts,” “z” as “dz,” and “s” remained “s.” Over time, “ts” and “dz” evolved into “th” in most of Spain, while in southern Spain, all three sounds merged into “s.” This linguistic shift occurred independently of the reigns of the supposed lisping kings. During the colonization of Latin America, many settlers came from Andalusia in southern Spain, where the “s” pronunciation was standard. As a result, Latin American Spanish adopted the “s” sound universally, while the “th” sound remains exclusive to Peninsular Spanish. ¿Tienes thentido?
3. Chinese Is Not a Single, Unified Language
Many assume Chinese is a single language spoken by over 1.3 billion people, with some recognizing Mandarin and Cantonese due to Hong Kong cinema’s influence. The Chinese government reinforces this idea by promoting Mandarin as the standard language and labeling other varieties as dialects.
In reality, China is home to dozens of distinct languages, which vary more from Mandarin than European languages differ from one another. The most prominent non-Mandarin language is Wu, spoken in Shanghai and regions like Zhejiang, Jiangsu, and Fujian. Often called Shanghainese, it’s known for its soft, flowing sound, though its speakers’ reluctance to use Mandarin can be off-putting. Cantonese, spoken in Hong Kong, Guangdong, and beyond, is a nasal language with nine tones and retains many features of Classical Chinese. Tang dynasty poetry often rhymes in Cantonese but rarely in Mandarin.
Other languages, such as Hokkien, Jin, Hunanese, Hakka, and Gan, are still spoken by millions across China. In the early 20th century, Shanghai intellectuals advocated for a national language to unify the country. However, the adoption of Mandarin led to the suppression of other Chinese languages, though they remain widely spoken in China and among overseas Chinese communities.
To understand the diversity among these languages, consider the following comparison:
English: Hello! Have you eaten? Mandarin: Ni hao! Ni chifan le ma? Wu: Nong haw! Nong qi gu le va? Cantonese: Leih hou! Leih sik dzo fan mei a? Hokkien: Li ho! Chiah pa bue? Hakka: Ngi ho! Ngi siit-de fan lo?
2. The Myth That Primitive Cultures Have Primitive Languages
A widespread myth suggests that cultures with less material development have simpler languages. This idea fuels stereotypes like caveman speech or isolated tribes communicating through grunts and gestures. These so-called primitive languages are thought to lack vocabulary, abstract terms, and proper grammar, evolving rapidly and randomly while being less sophisticated than languages of advanced societies. This misconception often extends to nonstandard dialects used by low-income groups. However, linguists have shown that all languages are equally capable of expressing complex ideas, and many less materially developed cultures possess highly intricate and expressive languages.
Languages vary in their ability to discuss specific topics, reflecting the needs of their cultures. For instance, the Saami language has up to 1,000 words for reindeer, and while the claim that Inuit languages have 50 words for snow was once considered a myth, recent evidence suggests some validity, as Inuit languages can combine multiple descriptors into single words. Similarly, Italian boasts numerous terms for coffee and pasta. English, as a global language, has adapted to handle everything from academic research to casual banter, but this doesn’t make it more advanced than an Amazonian language finely tuned for discussing hunting strategies.
1. British English Isn’t the Original Form of English
Many believe that Received Pronunciation (RP) in the UK represents the original form of English, with other varieties like American, Australian, and South African English diverging from it. In reality, British English has undergone more significant changes over the past 300 years than American English. In the 1700s, both British and American English were rhotic, pronouncing the “r” in words like “hard” or “far.” While Americans retained this feature, 19th-century Britain saw the rise of non-rhotic speech among the upper classes, which became standardized as Received Pronunciation. Through colonialism, education, and the BBC, non-rhotic English spread across the British Isles and its colonies.
Certain regions in the United States, such as New England and parts of the South, which maintained strong connections with southern England during colonial times, adopted non-rhotic speech. However, settlers in other areas hailed from Ireland, Scotland, and rhotic-speaking parts of England, leading to the preservation of rhotic pronunciation in what is now known as the General American accent.
Recently, there has been a growing effort to stage Shakespeare’s works in Original Pronunciation, an attempt to recreate the sounds of Elizabethan English as it might have been spoken. This reconstructed accent, while distinct from both modern British and American English, shares several features with American English, such as the pronounced rhotic “r” and a flat “a” sound in words like “bath” or “France.”
