Buzz
Throughout history, trained doubles have been utilized by politicians, creatives, actors, and business leaders for various purposes. Political decoys, for example, have been sent into dangerous situations to divert attention from potential assassins or, during wartime, to confuse the enemy about a leader's location or movements. Voice actors can imitate a leader's speech, while a look-alike might be part of an unusual artistic performance.
And things can get even stranger. The discussion of body doubles and impersonators often leads to a dive into the enigmatic world of conspiracy theories. While some claims are downright absurd, others make it challenging to separate fact from fiction or pseudohistory.
Below is a mix of verified and unverified stories involving the use of doubles, doppelgangers, and impersonators. It's up to you to decide what's true.
10. Was Andy Warhol Using A Body Double as an Outlandish Form of Performance Art?
On the evening of October 2, 1967, Andy Warhol delivered a lecture at the University of Utah. By then, Warhol had already become a major figure, widely recognized as the “Father of Pop Art,” largely for his famous Campbell's soup can paintings and silk screen prints of Marilyn Monroe.
The auditorium was filled to capacity, with over 1,100 attendees. A 40-minute segment of Warhol’s 1967 film **** was shown, followed by a Q&A session. However, Warhol’s responses were strangely detached and uninterested.
As journalist Angelyn Hutchinson recounted, Warhol stood on stage, wearing dark sunglasses and a coat, offering “vague answers, or almost no answer at all. When someone asked how he started his films, he responded with something like, ‘In the beginning, I think.’ It was just really nonsensical stuff like that.”
Warhol's manager, Paul Morrissey, later admitted that an impersonator had taken Warhol’s place during lectures at four universities, including Utah. According to Morrissey, Warhol believed that the impersonator, Allen Midgette, was more suitable for “public consumption” as he was more attractive and a more effective public speaker.
Some argue that it was a form of performance art. After the hoax was exposed, Warhol revealed that he intended to create a robot version of himself to send out to lectures. In many ways, robots and doubles mirrored life imitating art, much like his iconic reproductions of Marilyn Monroe, Elvis, and Campbell’s soup cans.
9. Could Winston Churchill’s Most Iconic Speeches Have Been Delivered by an Impersonator?
The notion that a voice actor stood in for Winston Churchill during some of his most crucial wartime speeches sounds absurd. Yet this theory has gained momentum after voice actor Norman Shelley confessed in 1977 that he was behind famous phrases like “We will fight them on the beaches” and “This will be our finest hour.”
Historian David Irving became a supporter of the theory. According to Shelley, and as Irving detailed in his book, Churchill’s War, Shelley claimed that Churchill was too preoccupied with the war to deliver certain speeches over the airwaves. With no recording devices available in the House of Commons, the job of broadcasting Churchill’s words fell to Shelley.
In 1990, the mystery deepened when the US speech analysis company Sensimetrics examined 20 of Churchill’s speeches and found that three of them were voiced by someone other than Churchill. Two of these speeches included the legendary Dunkirk address (“Fight them on the beaches”) and “The Finest Hour” speech.
In 2000, Shelley’s son, Anthony, presented what he believed to be proof of his father’s involvement as Churchill’s voice double: a 78-rpm record titled BBC, Churchill: Speech Artist Norman Shelley, dated September 7, 1942. On this record, it is claimed that the iconic phrase, “We shall fight them on the beaches,” can be heard.
Then things start to get complicated. David Irving’s assertion that Shelley had told him he was Churchill’s stand-in raises questions. The interview supposedly took place in December 1981, a full 16 months after Shelley had passed away! Moreover, Churchill expert Richard M. Langworth points out that eyewitness accounts have disproved the claim that Shelley delivered wartime speeches at the BBC. Langworth further argues that the 1942 recording is not the Dunkirk speech, but rather an obscure address that remains unknown to the public.
And what about the findings of Sensimetrics, which determined that three of Churchill’s speeches were voiced by someone else? Peter Orr of Argo, the distributor of the audiocassette versions, believes that Sensimetrics overlooked the natural variations in the human voice that occur over time. Additionally, they did not account for slight differences in the speed at which the recordings were made.
8. Felix Dadaev: Stalin’s Political Stand-In
In 2008, 88-year-old Felix Dadaev made a startling announcement: he had been Joseph Stalin’s political decoy, a role he had been compelled to keep hidden for years. When the Putin administration finally allowed him to disclose his secret, Dadaev published a book titled Variety Land. In the book, Dadaev shared the shocking truth: he had been one of four doubles for Stalin at public events.
Dadaev’s journey as Stalin’s stand-in began in 1943. After spending a year recovering from severe war injuries, he was taken by the NKVD (the KGB’s predecessor) for a top-secret transformation. In his twenties at the time, Dadaev underwent an extensive makeover, which, with the addition of makeup and Stalin’s signature haircut and mustache, made him nearly identical to the 60-year-old Soviet leader.
To perfect his impersonation, Dadaev studied footage of Stalin’s speeches, observing his mannerisms closely. He was able to convince Kremlin officials that he had become Stalin’s true double, which granted him permission to act as the political decoy.
Initially, Dadaev’s duties only involved posing as Stalin in the back of a car. But before long, he was meeting with high-ranking party officials. One of his most notable appearances was when he impersonated Stalin during a parade, standing on the central platform of a mausoleum in Red Square.
However, Dadaev’s most crucial role as Stalin’s decoy nearly ended in catastrophe. In February 1945, a plan was set in motion to secretly fly Stalin to the renowned Yalta Conference to meet with British Prime Minister Winston Churchill and US President Franklin D. Roosevelt. To throw off foreign intelligence, Dadaev, dressed in Stalin’s uniform, boarded a separate, widely publicized flight as a decoy.
However, as Dadaev recounted, 'It didn’t work. Two attempts were made in Yalta to kill the real Stalin. Our intelligence failed. I was back in Moscow by then.' It wasn’t Dadaev’s fault, and he continued to serve as the decoy until Stalin’s death on March 5, 1953.
7. Did General Montgomery’s Double Play a Role in Winning the Battle of Normandy?
In the weeks leading up to D-day, the Allies orchestrated a deception to mislead German intelligence into believing that the invasion would occur at Pas-de-Calais rather than Normandy. This deception involved fake military equipment, staged radio transmissions, and a mock army headed by General Patton.
The deception was taken a step further. Inspired by actor Miles Mander’s portrayal of Field Marshal Bernard Montgomery in the 1943 film Five Graves to Cairo, Lieutenant Colonel Dudley Clarke conceived a bold idea. What if an actor impersonating Montgomery appeared in a completely different part of the world right before the D-day invasion? Could this trick the Germans into miscalculating when and where the invasion would happen?
As one of the key masterminds behind the invasion, Montgomery’s success hinged on finding someone who could replicate his height, appearance, and mannerisms. The first choice, Miles Mander, was dismissed due to his height. The second candidate broke his leg in a car crash. The success of the mission ultimately relied on the third option, M.E. Clifton James.
James was an unconventional choice. Although an Australian actor, he wasn’t particularly skilled, but he had a remarkable ability to impersonate General Montgomery, which was helped by his lean face and drooping mustache.
James was flown to London and posed as a journalist, which granted him access to Montgomery’s inner circle. This allowed James to observe and adopt Montgomery’s body language and speech patterns to perfect his impersonation.
In order to make the deception convincing, a few hurdles had to be overcome. James had a fondness for drinking and smoking, habits that Montgomery didn’t share, so James had to quit both. Additionally, James had lost the middle finger on his right hand during World War I, so a prosthetic finger was crafted to avoid detection.
The elaborate ruse began on May 25, 1944, when James traveled to Gibraltar and then to Algiers. However, things soon began to unravel. James, in desperate need of a drink, was seen staggering drunk through the streets of Algiers. To prevent further issues, he was swiftly sent to Cairo, where he remained hidden until the invasion of Normandy began.
MI5 considered the operation a success. German intelligence believed that 'Monty' was still stationed in North Africa on May 28. However, there’s no clear indication that this deception had any significant impact on Germany’s preparations for the upcoming Allied invasion. This could be attributed to the fact that the ruse was executed too early, with the actual D-day invasion occurring nine days later, on June 6, 1944.
After the war, James got the opportunity to play both himself and General Montgomery in the film adaptation of his memoir, I Was Monty’s Double (1958).
6. A Mexican Politician’s Public Competition to Find a Double
Generally, the purpose of using body doubles is to keep them under wraps, ensuring the safety of important individuals by deploying the impersonators as decoys. However, this was not the case for Mexican politician Renato Tronco Gomez.
Gomez came up with the novel idea of holding a national competition to find the best candidates to serve as his body doubles. In 2015, he shared with the Mexican newspaper El Pais that his intention was not to use doubles for safety, but rather to maintain his popularity.
According to Gomez, staying popular meant being able to be in multiple places simultaneously. His doubles would not only resemble him but also be trained to act like him. People in his Veracruz constituency would be notified when a double was sent to speak with them, though these impersonators would have clear limitations.
“Above all, they will not be allowed to live in my house, sleep with my wife, or attend Congress,” Gomez explained.
5. Wealthy Chinese Citizens Use Doubles to Avoid Prison
Money may not buy everything, but in China, if you’re wealthy enough, it can secure a look-alike to take your place in court and serve your prison sentence. In 2012, Geoffrey Sant from Slate uncovered the practice known as “replacement convicts.”
Sant recounts the public outrage in China when Hu Bin, a 20-year-old with wealth, paid someone to stand in for him at his trial. Hu Bin had caused a fatal accident, hitting a man and sending him flying 18 meters (60 ft) while driving at high speed.
A police officer informed Sant that while the practice isn't widespread, it isn't particularly rare either. The officer mentioned examples of Mafia bosses who would have subordinates serve their time in exchange for financial support for their families, along with a financial reward upon their release. This practice isn't confined to the criminal world; some businessmen have had employees take the blame, though occasionally a family member may stand in.
Replacement convicts have a long history in China. Many Westerners who lived in and traveled through China in the 19th century documented this practice. Astonishingly, some criminals were able to hire stand-ins even for their executions. In 1847, British diplomat T.T. Meadows explained that individuals would be willing to face execution in exchange for money to support their starving families.
4. The Computer Program That Could Determine Differences Between The Fake And Real Saddam Husseins
During the Iraq War, the Bush administration speculated that Saddam Hussein employed body doubles. Iraqi defectors revealed that plastic surgery was used to create look-alikes, who were then trained to mimic Saddam's mannerisms, gait, and facial expressions.
In September 2002, a BBC documentary featured Dr. Dieter Buhmann, a German forensic pathologist specializing in reconstructing the faces of murder victims. As a side project, Buhmann examined Saddam’s face to figure out whether or not the Iraqi leader used body doubles.
For years, Buhmann analyzed various footage and photos of Saddam. He meticulously compared facial measurements, paying special attention to the length of the mustache and eyebrows. Points along Saddam's nose and cheekbones were also analyzed and compared by computer.
From his analysis, the German forensic pathologist concluded that Saddam Hussein most likely used four different doubles. The differences between them and the real Saddam were subtle—slightly softer facial lines, a marginally smaller mouth, or a face that was just a fraction wider.
3. What Became of the ‘True’ Howard Hughes?
Did the billionaire mogul and aviator Howard Hughes fall victim to a kidnapping orchestrated by shipping magnate Aristotle Onassis, who allegedly replaced him with a body double? This question lies at the core of the expansive conspiracy theories known as “The Gemstone File.”
This theory connects Hughes, Onassis, the Kennedys, the Bush family, and various other figures in a massive and complex tale that paints an alternate history filled with corrupt politicians, oil and drug interests, Mafia-controlled elections, and the tragic assassinations of JFK and RFK.
According to “Gemstone,” Onassis took control of Howard Hughes’s empire in 1957, believing Hughes to be a rival. The theory claims Onassis replaced Hughes after he suffered brain damage during a kidnapping attempt at his bungalow in The Beverly Hills Hotel. Hughes allegedly spent the rest of his life as a wheelchair-bound invalid on Onassis’s private Greek island, Skorpios.
Hughes was allegedly substituted with body double L. Wayne Rector, a man Hughes had employed since 1955. Onassis is said to have arranged for the double to take on Hughes's identity. Given that Hughes was already a recluse, this deception may have been relatively easy to maintain.
Reports suggest that actress Jean Peters entered into a sham marriage with Hughes on March 16, 1957. The couple reportedly had limited interactions, with Hughes living in seclusion, and Peters's silence about the marriage even after Hughes's “death” only fueled the conspiracy theory.
In 1967, Onassis is believed to have used the Hughes empire as a cover for taking control of Las Vegas gambling operations. Meanwhile, the real Hughes was supposedly subjected to 14 years of heroin injections and eventually died from a fatal overdose in 1971.
Hughes was said to have been buried at sea. The tale of his sea burial and supposed kidnapping was published in Playgirl magazine by Mae Brussell. The official record claims that Howard Hughes passed away on April 5, 1976.
Interestingly, one of Hughes’s closest friends, James Bond producer Albert R. “Cubby” Broccoli, incorporated a similar storyline in the 1971 film Diamonds Are Forever. In the movie, the character Willard Whyte is a reclusive billionaire who controls oil interests, satellites, and, of course, Las Vegas casinos.
In a twist, Ernst Stavro Blofeld, the notorious Bond villain, controls Whyte's empire using a voice box to imitate Whyte’s Texas accent over the phone. Meanwhile, the real Whyte is kept captive in his hilltop residence.
Broccoli asserted that the concept came to him in a dream, but its eerie resemblance to The Gemstone File raises questions. In his dream, Hughes had been replaced by a stand-in. Was Broccoli trying to reveal something to the public?
2. Was a Second Oswald Created to Kill JFK?
There are numerous persistent conspiracy theories surrounding the assassination of US President John F. Kennedy. Perhaps the most bizarre is the claim that a second Lee Harvey Oswald was trained and raised by the CIA or some shadowy organization to carry out the assassination. Richard Popkin was the first to introduce the “Two Oswalds” theory, based on various eyewitness accounts stating that Oswald was seen in two places at the same time.
John Armstrong expanded on this theory in his book Harvey and Lee: How the CIA Framed Oswald (2003). Armstrong claims that the elaborate assassination scheme was referred to as the 'Oswald project,' which involved two look-alikes: one born in America, Lee Oswald, and the other, Harvey Oswald, who spoke Russian.
While the two men weren’t exact duplicates, their similarities were said to be sufficient to deceive those who knew them. In the years leading up to JFK’s assassination, both Oswalds had their personal histories, including schooling and work experience from the past decade, merged. This was done to provide the foreign-born Harvey with an American identity. In 1959, Harvey defected to Russia, only to return to the United States in 1962 with a wife. A year later, he was distributing pro-Castro materials in Cuba.
Armstrong asserts that the plan to frame Harvey gained momentum. Lee Oswald made several moves to directly tie Harvey to JFK’s assassination. In one notable instance, Lee tried to purchase scoped rifles from Robert McKeown, one of Castro’s gun suppliers. However, Lee offered exorbitant prices for the rifles, prompting McKeown to decline the deal.
McKeown was aware that the same rifles could be purchased for much lower prices at Sears, Roebuck and Company, making it evident that Lee was attempting to link Castro to the upcoming assassination.
Moreover, multiple eyewitnesses reported seeing Lee Harvey Oswald with Jack Ruby, which raised suspicions given that Ruby publicly killed Oswald two days after the Kennedy assassination. Armstrong suggests that Ruby worked with Lee Oswald to frame Harvey as the perfect scapegoat, then eliminated Harvey to cover up their involvement.
Although it may sound peculiar, the possibility of a second Oswald or an impersonator was considered by FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover. In a 1960 memo, Hoover noted, 'There is a possibility that an impostor is using Oswald’s birth certificate.'
1. Did Latif Yahia Fabricate His Story About Being Uday Hussein’s Body Double?
Latif Yahia claims that from 1988 to 1991, he served as the fiday (body double) for Saddam Hussein’s son Uday. Around 2003, Yahia shared his account with news outlets in both the UK and the US.
Initially, Yahia rejected the role of being Uday Hussein’s body double and was imprisoned for a week. However, after Uday threatened to harm his sisters, Yahia agreed. He then underwent six months of training to master Uday’s gestures and speech patterns, including the distinct rolling of his 'Rs.'
Eventually, Yahia underwent plastic surgery and dental procedures to resemble Uday. During his time as the fiday, he survived several assassination attempts, reportedly bearing the scars from 26 bullet wounds.
However, this was nothing compared to the horrific acts committed by Uday. Yahia witnessed Uday drill holes into people's skulls, use a spoon to scoop out the eyes of his victims, and commit horrific acts of violence against schoolgirls and pregnant women. The situation worsened when Uday ordered Yahia to kill the father of a girl he had raped, but Yahia refused.
By 1991, tensions reached their peak when a woman showed more interest in Yahia than in Uday. In a fit of rage, Uday shot Yahia in the shoulder. Despite his injury, Yahia managed to flee to Mosul and, with the help of his family, was smuggled out of Iraq to Turkey. There, with the assistance of the CIA, Yahia was granted a UN passport and found refuge in the European Union.
Yahia recounted these events in his 1995 book, The Devil’s Double, which was adapted into a 2011 film of the same name. However, some journalists question the veracity of his account.
Haytham Ajmaya, an Iraqi defector who was part of Uday's inner circle, dismissed Yahia's story as entirely false, stating: 'It’s a real shame that Hollywood has decided to make a film based on rubbish rather than a film that is true to Iraq’s history.'
