Buzz
This conspiracy theory has gained widespread popularity, partly because many of its assertions are rooted in partial truths. Some theorists argue that the major events of the 20th century, especially the two world wars that resulted in unprecedented casualties and reshaped the globe, were meticulously orchestrated. They suggest that the same influential figures controlled both sides, and these events were planned over decades.
These conspiracy theories have fueled ideas about a 'secret global government,' along with speculations about the Illuminati, their identity, and their ultimate objectives. While none of these claims have been substantiated, if proven true, they would demand our attention to prevent history from repeating itself.
10. The 'Secret Forecasts' of Disraeli
Benjamin Disraeli is regarded by many in the political sphere as one of Britain's most impactful figures, particularly during the 19th century. He held the position of British prime minister twice and was deeply involved in the political transformations and events of his time, not only in Westminster but across Europe, as the world evolved in response to the growing influence of the United States.
In 1844, Disraeli published a fictional work titled Coningsby, or The New Generation, a political thriller intertwined with contemporary events. For some, the book concealed deeper truths and even foreshadowed future global developments. The novel referenced 'invisible forces' operating behind the scenes, manipulating events unbeknownst to the public and even most politicians. These forces were said to influence Europe's affairs and covert revolutionary movements.
Given Disraeli's intellect and his extensive political experience in the mid- to late 1800s, it's reasonable to assume he had insights into how certain events might unfold. However, some argue that his predictions were too precise to be mere speculation. Reflecting on his remarks about 'revolutions,' we turn to one of the most significant revolutions of the 20th century in the following entry.
9. The Origins of the Russian Revolution
While the Russian Revolution, in simple terms, occurred in 1917 due to the dire conditions on the Russian front during World War I, anti-establishment sentiments had been simmering for decades. Moreover, external influences appear to have played an indirect role in fueling these tensions.
As we’ll explore in the next entry, Russia was persuaded to sign so-called 'mutually beneficial' agreements with nations like France and Britain. In reality, these pacts isolated Russia and strained its relations with traditional allies such as Germany. Additionally, Russia was pushed into a conflict with Japan from 1904 to 1905, a war that left the nation disheartened and sparked a failed rebellion.
An intriguing aspect of this conflict, which reflects a recurring pattern in the 20th century, is the financing behind the Russo-Japanese War. The Russian side, represented by the Romanov royal family, received funds from the Rothschild family’s European banks. Meanwhile, Japan was backed by an American bank, Kuhn, Loeb & Co., which was also under Rothschild control. Jacob Schiff, who managed Kuhn, Loeb & Co., had long-standing ties to the Rothschild family, dating back centuries.
8. Early 20th Century Agreements and Treaties
As previously noted, the early 20th century witnessed a series of international agreements signed among various European nations, including Russia. Officially, these pacts aimed to preserve regional peace.
However, after the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand, Austria-Hungary declared war on Serbia, holding them responsible for the killing. Bound by their treaty, Russia stepped in to support Serbia. This triggered a chain reaction, with each nation obligated to assist its allies. Consequently, France and Britain were compelled to aid Russia and Serbia, while the Central Powers—comprising Bulgaria, the Ottoman Empire, Germany, and Austria-Hungary—united against them.
Interestingly, once Russia officially joined the Allies in the war, they were supplied with arms by Vickers & Maxim, a company overseen by Ernest Cassel. Cassel, a long-time associate of the Rothschilds, also had connections to Kuhn, Loeb & Co. Significant delays in delivering these weapons to Russian forces worsened morale (some soldiers were sent to battle without arms) and ultimately fueled the revolution. Many researchers have since speculated that these delays were deliberate.
7. The Rothschilds and Their Role in Financing Both Sides
As seen in the Russo-Japanese War, the Rothschild family indirectly funded both sides of the conflict. This pattern persisted during World War I and extended into World War II.
While Standard Oil financed, equipped, and armed the Allied forces, IG Farben performed the same role for the Nazis. (As we’ll explore later, a significant portion of Nazi funding also originated from the Soviet Union, adding further complexity to the situation.) Both IG Farben and Standard Oil were either owned or controlled by the Rothschild family through majority stakes.
Interestingly, it wasn’t just global wars that received unexpected financial backing. The Russian Revolution, a rebellion rooted in communist ideals, was largely funded by capitalist banks in the West, as we’ll examine next.
6. The Russian Revolution Backed by Capitalist Funds
When discussing the Russian Revolution, Leon Trotsky and Vladimir Lenin are often the first names that come to mind. Both were committed communists who seemingly spearheaded the creation of the Soviet Union and the controversial demise of the Romanov family. However, during the 1917 uprisings in Russia, both Trotsky and Lenin were comfortably residing in the 'evil' capitalist West.
Additionally, both Lenin and Trotsky received significant financial support from their capitalist 'opponents' upon their return to Russia. For instance, Lenin traveled from Switzerland, a haven for the financial elite, with funds provided by the Federal Reserve and the City of London. A 1919 US Congressional report revealed large sums of money (amounting to millions of dollars) deposited in a secret account designated for Lenin or Trotsky.
Interestingly, Trotsky arrived in Russia using a US passport, personally authorized by President Woodrow Wilson. He also carried $10,000 in cash, a direct contribution from the US government.
5. World War I Paved the Way for World War II (Intentionally?)
By the conclusion of World War I, not only had millions lost their lives unnecessarily, but Europe was forever transformed. The Treaty of Versailles reshaped the continent so profoundly that nine new nations emerged from the aftermath. Many of these were revived states that had previously been absorbed by the Central Powers. The geopolitical landscape had shifted dramatically.
Moreover, this transformation was far from complete, as further chaos and the even greater atrocities of World War II loomed just two decades later. It’s plausible to argue that the devastation and subsequent reparations deliberately set the stage for future conflict, especially in Germany, where Adolf Hitler exploited the nation’s crippled economy to rise to power. Once in control, he launched his campaign across Europe, reclaiming former 'empires' as part of a new German dominion. However, the initial invasion of Europe, particularly Eastern Europe, was not solely a German endeavor.
4. Agreements Between the Soviets and Nazis
Similar to the treaties signed before World War I, Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union entered into several pacts and agreements in the decade leading up to World War II.
These agreements, including the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact and the German-Soviet Credit Agreement, ensured that neither nation would support the other’s enemies. They also safeguarded each other’s interests while ignoring any misconduct. Additionally, the treaties facilitated the seamless transfer of resources like rubber, steel, and funds between the two countries.
The Soviet Union and Nazi Germany had secretly established a 'sphere of influence' across Eastern Europe, undermining the power and authority of Britain and France. It’s also important to note that the invasion of Poland wasn’t solely carried out by Germany. Soviet troops advanced from the opposite direction. They also seized control of Latvia, Lithuania, and Estonia, while German forces overwhelmed France.
3. IG Farben and Standard Oil
As previously mentioned, these companies, largely controlled by the Rothschilds, financed both sides during World War II. This financial setup fuels many conspiracy theories surrounding major 20th-century conflicts, and it’s easy to understand why. Notably, IG Farben not only funded the Nazi war effort but also played a role in establishing the death camps across Europe. Some theorists argue these camps were used by 'Western' corporate entities to conduct eugenics experiments, a practice allegedly continued under the CIA through initiatives like Operation Paperclip.
Many US soldiers in Germany observed that IG Farben facilities remained eerily intact amidst widespread destruction. Both IG Farben and Standard Oil profited immensely from post-war reconstruction projects and the arms race triggered by the Cold War, which dominated much of the latter half of the 20th century.
2. The Ideological Connection Between Nazi Germany and Soviet Communism
As previously noted, the Soviet Union didn’t just passively support Nazi invasions; they launched their own campaigns to seize territories they had long desired. However, some sources claim that Stalin and other top Soviet officials held a deep admiration for Nazi Germany. During the late 1930s and early 1940s, Soviet leader Vyacheslav Molotov delivered several fervent speeches praising Nazism and Nazi Germany, even stating that opposing it would be a 'crime.'
It’s also noteworthy how closely the Soviet Union’s tactics mirrored those of the Nazis, particularly in propaganda. Many Jewish individuals fled Stalin’s Russia, only to find themselves facing the Nazis. In some cases, Soviet forces handed them over to the Nazis.
Some researchers argue that Stalin was so captivated by Nazi Germany that when he received intelligence about an impending Nazi invasion, he dismissed it as a mistake. This delay allowed the Nazis to make significant advances into Russia. However, by December 1941, Soviet forces began to repel them. It’s intriguing to consider what might have happened if Hitler hadn’t invaded the Soviet Union when he did. Yet, if one believes in the theory of 'unseen forces' orchestrating events, the decision may not have been his to make.
1. The Soviets 'Supplied' the Nazis
Even after the Nazis’ true intentions became evident and Britain had declared war on them, the Soviet Union continued to engage in agreements with Nazi Germany. These deals, whether deliberate or not, significantly aided the Nazis in rapidly and effectively building up their military strength. In fact, some historians argue that without these pacts and Soviet support, the rise of Nazi Germany, as the world witnessed it, might not have been possible.
The 1940 German-Soviet Commercial Agreement facilitated the smooth transfer of oil, raw materials for weapon production, and even grain to feed Nazi troops. These resources and funds were exchanged regularly as needed. In return, Nazi Germany granted the Soviets access to cutting-edge research from their scientists.
Although the ideologies of Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union seemed fundamentally opposed, they weren’t—at least not in Stalin’s worldview, which we’ll explore further in the next entry.
