Buzz
By delving deeper into the pages of your most cherished novels, you might stumble upon some bizarre conspiracy theories. From the Elizabethan era to the modern day, readers have spun wild tales about authors and their works, including secret identities and shocking scandals.
10. Does J.K. Rowling Truly Exist?
J.K. Rowling is often portrayed as an ordinary working mother who rose to fame and fortune as a celebrated author. However, Norwegian filmmaker Nine Grunfeld claims this is a fabrication. She argues that J.K. Rowling is a fictional persona, and the true author behind the Harry Potter series remains a mystery.
Grunfeld argues that the Harry Potter series is far too successful to be the creation of a single individual. She questions how Rowling managed to write seven novels in just a decade and how an unknown author could sell over 250 million copies globally. Grunfeld suggests the operation is too polished and professional to be the work of one person. Instead, she believes Harry Potter is a corporate project, crafted by a team of writers similar to the Nancy Drew series. The woman known as J.K. Rowling, according to Grunfeld, is merely an actress hired to deceive the public. Could it be that Grunfeld is just a tad envious?
9. Did Charlotte Bronte Murder Her Sisters?
The Bronte family was truly extraordinary. Charlotte Bronte authored Jane Eyre, Emily penned Wuthering Heights, and Anne wrote the less famous The Tenant of Wildfell Hall. While only Charlotte’s and Anne’s works gained recognition during their lifetimes, all three novels are now considered English literature classics. Tragically, none of the Brontes lived beyond their thirties, succumbing to tuberculosis. But was TB really the cause?
Criminologist James Tully, author of The Crimes of Charlotte Bronte, proposes a far darker explanation. Tully claims Charlotte, envious of her sisters’ success, conspired with her father’s curate, Arthur Bell Nicholls, to poison Anne, Emily, and their brother Branwell. Emily and Branwell died in 1848, followed by Anne in 1849, leaving Charlotte and Arthur to collect the royalties. After the murders, Charlotte and Arthur married, but Tully alleges Nicholls betrayed Charlotte, poisoning her to eliminate the last Bronte and keeping the royalties for himself.
Tully attempted to publish his theories as a nonfiction book but faced rejection from publishers. Consequently, he transformed his work into a novel, demonstrating that sometimes reality isn’t as bizarre as fiction.
8. Were J.R.R. Tolkien and C.S. Lewis Secret Occultists?
J.R.R. Tolkien and C.S. Lewis are celebrated as two of the greatest fantasy authors, with their works adored globally. Yet, some conspiracy theorists argue that both authors were deeply immersed in occult practices, allegedly preparing their readers for a New World Order—the ultimate conspiracy.
For instance, in The Lord of the Rings, Sauron’s eye is said to symbolize the Illuminati’s all-seeing eye. Some theorists suggest Gandalf represents the famed occultist Aleister Crowley, while Frodo is seen as an aspirant seeking initiation into Gandalf’s secretive brotherhood of dark magic. The controversial John Todd even claimed Tolkien plagiarized his stories from The Book of Shadows, a Wiccan text, and that his runes are actually part of the witches’ alphabet.
Additionally, some theorists assert that the Illuminati employs rings as tools for enslavement! The poem of the “One Ring” is supposedly a spell designed to manipulate and control those under its influence. As evidence, conspiracy theorists highlight Tolkien’s tenure at Oxford, a university they believe is controlled by the Illuminati. They argue that Tolkien was subtly conditioning his readers to accept occult ideologies, paving the way for the Illuminati’s future dominance.
As for Lewis, his works are often seen as Christian allegories, but conspiracy theorist Mary van Nattan argues that Aslan symbolizes pagan sun gods. In The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe, Narnia is trapped in perpetual winter until Aslan’s return, which mirrors the mid-winter solstice bringing light to the darkest season. Van Nattan also notes Aslan’s golden fur, face, and eyes, drawing parallels to the sun’s golden radiance.
Returning to John Todd’s claims, he insists that Lewis’s works are essential reading for anyone aspiring to join a witch’s coven. So, aspiring witches might want to start their journey at a Christian bookstore.
7. Was Edgar Allan Poe Assassinated?
As the pioneer of detective fiction, Edgar Allan Poe’s death remains an unsolved mystery. On October 3, 1849, Poe was found in Baltimore, disoriented and dressed in another man’s clothes. He passed away four days later under unclear circumstances. Theories range from overdose and diabetes to rabies, while some believe he was the victim of foul play.
One prominent theory is that Poe fell victim to “cooping,” a 19th-century election fraud tactic. Gangs would abduct men, intoxicate them, and force them to vote repeatedly for a specific candidate. To avoid recognition, the captives were made to change clothes each time they voted. This could explain Poe’s disheveled state and unfamiliar attire when he was found.
Another theory points to a personal motive. Poe was reportedly involved with a woman whose brothers were fiercely protective. Upon discovering Poe’s alcoholism, they allegedly confronted him and persuaded him to end the relationship. Their persuasion may have been more forceful than intended.
The strangest theory involves the Masons. Poe’s short stories, such as “The Cask of Amontillado” and “Never Bet the Devil Your Head,” supposedly exposed Masonic secrets, leading to their retaliation. Historians, however, dismiss this theory as far-fetched and lacking evidence.
6. Who Authored Shakespeare’s Plays?
The authorship of Shakespeare’s works has been debated by both skeptics and academics. Supporters of the Stratford-upon-Avon native as the sole author of masterpieces like Hamlet are called Stratfordians. Opponents, known as anti-Stratfordians, include prominent figures like Charlie Chaplin, Vanessa Redgrave, Sigmund Freud, Charles Dickens, and Orson Welles.
Conspiracy theorists struggle to accept that a commoner like Shakespeare could have written such profound works. Born to a glover and wool-smuggler, Shakespeare was merely an actor without a university education. How could someone of his background craft some of the most exquisite prose in English literature? Anti-Stratfordians argue that his lack of royal connections and foreign travel makes it impossible for him to write with such insight. They believe the true author must have been someone of higher education and social standing.
Anti-Stratfordians propose several candidates, with Christopher Marlowe, Edward de Vere, and Sir Francis Bacon being the most popular. Marlowe, a renowned playwright, was supposedly killed in a bar fight before many of Shakespeare’s plays were written. However, theorists claim he survived, was smuggled to France as a Crown spy, and continued writing under Shakespeare’s name.
Edward de Vere, the 17th Earl of Oxford, is another candidate, famously supported by the film Anonymous. However, de Vere also died before plays like Macbeth and The Tempest were published, casting doubt on this theory.
The Francis Bacon theory stands out as the most credible, primarily because he was alive during the relevant period. Some argue he was the sole author of Shakespeare’s works, while others suggest he was part of a collaborative group of dramatists. Mark Twain supported the Bacon hypothesis, claiming to find hidden references like “Francisco Bacono” in Shakespeare’s First Folio. For those seeking a more unconventional theory, some even propose Queen Elizabeth I as the true author. The debate continues over whether Shakespeare earned his legacy or if it was bestowed upon him.
5. Is The Count of Monte Cristo a Jesuit Allegory?
The Jesuits are often portrayed as a shadowy force in conspiracy theories, and Eric Phelps, author of Vatican Assassins, attributes nearly every major event to their influence. He even sees their presence in classic literature, arguing that Alexandre Dumas exposed the Society of Jesus in The Count of Monte Cristo.
Phelps interprets the Count as a symbol of the Jesuit General, the leader of the Jesuit order accused of inciting wars and political chaos. Historically, European monarchs exiled the Jesuits to an island off Portugal, mirroring the Count’s imprisonment on an island after being framed by rivals. In Dumas’ novel, the Count escapes and exacts revenge on his enemies, paralleling the Jesuits’ alleged resurgence and influence.
In a similar vein, the Jesuit General retaliated against Europe by orchestrating the rise of Napoleon Bonaparte. Still skeptical? Consider the title: “Monte” translates to “Mount,” and “Cristo” means “Christ,” making the book’s true title “The Count of the Mount of Christ.” The evidence seems clear. (Solving mysteries is simpler than it appears.)
4. Was Tom Clancy Involved in a 9/11 Conspiracy?
Carol Valentine disputes the official 9/11 narrative, calling it implausible. She argues that a group of knife-wielding terrorists couldn’t have hijacked four planes and successfully struck three targets with such precision. The flawless timing and execution seem too orchestrated, and she questions why only Flight 93 passengers resisted.
Valentine instead accuses Israel and its sympathizers within the U.S. government, claiming they used remote-controlled planes to carry out the attacks. She asserts that the terrorists were a fabrication, serving as a distraction from the true perpetrators.
Valentine further claims the U.S. government enlisted Tom Clancy to bolster the credibility of the hijacking narrative. She argues it’s no coincidence that Clancy’s 1994 novel Debt of Honor depicts a terrorist flying a plane into the Capitol. According to her, the Pentagon collaborated with Clancy to plant the idea that such an attack was plausible. Without Debt of Honor, she believes people would have immediately suspected remote-controlled planes orchestrated by Zionists, as it’s supposedly the more logical conclusion.
3. Was Stephen King Responsible for John Lennon’s Death?
The theory that the CIA brainwashed Mark David Chapman to kill John Lennon faces a twist: perhaps Chapman was merely a scapegoat, and the true culprit was Stephen King. Steve Lightfoot, author of Stephen King Shot John Lennon, proposes this idea. While it may seem far-fetched, Lightfoot insists it’s plausible.
Lightfoot alleges that Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan sought to silence Lennon and his peace activism. He claims to have uncovered this conspiracy by decoding hidden messages in Time and Newsweek headlines. According to him, Nixon and Reagan hired Stephen King as the assassin, while Chapman was an actor paid to take the blame. Lightfoot points to the famous photo of Lennon signing an autograph for Chapman hours before his death, arguing that the man in the photo isn’t Chapman but King, citing discrepancies in glasses, hair, and facial features.
Additional evidence of King’s alleged involvement lies in his novels Salem’s Lot and The Dead Zone, where he supposedly embedded hints to mock those investigating his crimes. Lightfoot even asserts that he has received threatening letters from King, urging him to remain silent about the conspiracy.
Lightfoot is deeply committed to his theory. On his van, he has displayed his website address and the bold statement, “Stephen King, not Chapman, killed Lennon. It’s true, or he’d sue.” Since King owns a home in Florida, Lightfoot attended a Sarasota city council meeting with homemade signs to alert the community about King’s supposed crimes. Clearly, Lightfoot is no admirer of King.
2. Is The Catcher in the Rye a CIA Brainwashing Tool?
The Catcher in the Rye is one of the most debated novels in history. From 1961 to 1982, J.D. Salinger’s story of teenage rebellion was the most banned book in U.S. schools and libraries. While parents often objected to its explicit language and sexual themes, conspiracy theorists believe the book poses a far greater danger. Some fear that Holden Caulfield’s narrative has the power to incite violent behavior.
We previously discussed Mark David Chapman’s 1980 assassination of John Lennon, but just a year later, John Hinckley Jr. attempted to kill President Ronald Reagan. What connects these two individuals? Both were devoted readers of The Catcher in the Rye. Notably, Chapman was so fixated on the book that after shooting Lennon, he sat on the sidewalk reading it mere feet from the musician’s body.
Were these the actions of typical assassins? Or were Chapman and Hinckley victims of CIA brainwashing? Conspiracy theorists propose that Salinger worked for the CIA and that his novel serves as a “control mechanism.” In a piece for Paranoia Magazine, Adam Gorightly suggested the book acts as a trigger, implanting post-hypnotic suggestions similar to the queen of hearts in Richard Condon’s The Manchurian Candidate, compelling mind-controlled individuals to assassinate predetermined targets. Essentially, reading Catcher activates a sleeper agent to eliminate specific figures, such as musicians or presidents. Is The Catcher in the Rye a danger to public figures, or is this theory entirely baseless?
1. Was Lewis Carroll Actually Jack the Ripper?
Jack the Ripper has sparked countless books, films, and theories about his true identity. Conspiracy theorist Richard Wallace argues that Charles Lutwidge Dodgson, better known as Lewis Carroll, was the infamous killer. This theory takes us deep into a speculative rabbit hole.
In his book, Jack the Ripper, Light-Hearted Friend, Wallace asserts that Carroll collaborated with his friend, Thomas Vere Bayne, to target the local prostitute population. However, Wallace’s theory is somewhat speculative, as it relies on anagrams extracted from Carroll’s writings. For instance, while examining The Nursery Alice (a condensed version of Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland), Wallace encountered this passage:
“So she wandered away, through the wood, carrying the ugly little thing with her. And a great job it was to keep hold of it, it wriggled about so. But at least she found out that the proper way to keep tight hold of its foot and its right ear.”
Wallace rearranged some letters and eventually uncovered a more sinister message:
“She wriggled about so! But at last Dodgson and Bayne found a way to keep hold of the fat little whore. I got a tight hold of her and slit her throat, left ear to right. It was tough, wet, disgusting, too. So weary of it, they threw up—Jack the Ripper.”
Wallace had to omit a few letters and alter an “o” to an “i” to reveal Carroll’s alleged “secret.” Additionally, Wallace highlights Carroll’s fascination with the number 42, which appears in works like Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland and “The Hunting of the Snark.” Wallace theorizes that all murder victims are linked to this number. For example, Emma Smith was 45 at her death—three more than 42. Martha Tabram was stabbed 39 times and was 39 years old—three less than 42. The theory falters with Mary Kelley, who was 25 when killed, though Wallace speculates Carroll thought she was 24, which is 42 reversed. Perhaps 42 isn’t the universal key after all.
