Buzz
Researchers have confirmed with 99.999% certainty that the remains unearthed beneath a Leicester parking lot in 2012 belong to King Richard III. The last Plantagenet monarch, Richard III, met his end at the Battle of Bosworth Field in 1485, defeated by Henry Tudor. His body was hastily interred at Greyfriars Abbey, which, after the friary's dissolution in 1538, eventually became a parking lot.
As reported by the BBC, the skeleton's pronounced spinal curvature initially suggested it was Richard III, aligning with historical accounts of his hunchback. Dr. Turi King of Leicester University led a team that confirmed the identity through DNA analysis, with their findings published in Nature Communications.
Modern analysis reveals that while Richard III did have a curved spine, his appearance differed significantly from 16th-century portrayals. DNA evidence indicates he likely had blond hair and blue eyes, contrasting with Shakespeare's dark and brooding depiction. Researchers note his hair may have darkened as he aged.
The skull of King Richard III, discovered in Leicester, England, in 2012. (Photo by Dan Kitwood/Getty Images)
More startling than Richard III’s physical traits is the DNA evidence suggesting a disruption in the royal bloodline. As the BBC reports, this could challenge the legitimacy of the Tudor dynasty or Richard III’s own claim to the throne.
The BBC and Nature Communications explore the intricate biological details, but in short: Researchers matched the maternal DNA (X chromosome) of Richard III to two living descendants of his eldest sister, Anne of York. Michael Ibsen and Wendy Dulig, 14th cousins and members of the House of York, share an exceptionally rare genetic lineage with the remains found in the parking lot.
The paternal side (Y chromosome) presents complications. The skeleton’s DNA does not align with the Y chromosomes of living descendants of the fifth Duke of Beaufort, who traces his lineage to John of Gaunt. Both the Tudors and Richard III descend from Edward III, but the inconsistency suggests a “false paternity event”—likely infidelity—somewhere between Edward III and Richard III. This could undermine the legitimacy of both the Yorkist and Tudor claims to the throne.
Genealogy expert Kevin Shürer offers clarity. He told CNN, “There are significant figures in that lineage, including monarchs like Richard III and Edward III. If the break occurred in the Yorkist line, it could question the Yorkists’ right to rule. Similarly, if it happened in the Lancastrian line, which connects to the Tudors, it could challenge their legitimacy as well.”
What does this imply for Queen Elizabeth II and the British royal family? According to Shürer, it has no impact. He explained to CNN, “We are not suggesting the House of Windsor lacks legitimacy. Royal succession is far more complex than a direct lineage from Edward III to Elizabeth II. While they are connected, the monarchy’s history is shaped by chance, opportunity, and numerous historical shifts, not just ancestry.”
