This isn't the Higgs boson itself, but the graphic illustrates traces from proton-proton collisions. (And let's be honest, it’s visually striking too.)
Fabrice Coffrini/AFP/Getty ImagesBack in July 2012, the Higgs boson made its global debut: a shimmering, tiny light that flickered on our screens, reminiscent of Tinker Bell. Well, not exactly.
Physicists were ecstatic to 'observe' the Higgs boson — the mysterious particle that forms the Higgs field, enabling other particles to acquire mass. However, what they truly observed was a collection of numbers, charts, and data indicating the particle's detection. Even the term 'detected' requires further clarification.
As reported, the data achieved a 5-sigma level of certainty. You might have heard that '5-sigma' implies a one in million probability that the Higgs boson doesn't exist. But hold on. Like much in physics, it's more nuanced. The 5-sigma confidence level actually means there's a one in million chance that, even if the Higgs didn't exist, CERN would have observed the same results. In simpler terms, there's a one in million probability that an experiment searching for the Higgs would produce data suggesting its existence, even if it weren't real.
If scientists at CERN (the European Organization for Nuclear Research) weren’t anticipating something reminiscent of a "Peter Pan" stage prop, what exactly were they searching for? For decades, physicists were baffled by the fact that particles such as electrons and quarks possessed mass. They weren’t criticizing the tiny building blocks of atoms and molecules; rather, their mathematical models of a symmetrical universe only functioned if particles were massless [source: Greene].
Peter Higgs and his colleagues proposed a groundbreaking idea. Instead of altering equations to accommodate particles with mass, why not retain the existing math and introduce the concept of a field that resists particle movement? If such a field existed, it could contain a substance that imparts mass by creating resistance. Picture a fly moving effortlessly until it hits a powerful headwind, suddenly feeling much heavier. Similarly, particles would gain mass as they moved through the Higgs field.
Physicists weren’t on the hunt for a universal, unnoticed syrup-like substance. Instead, they sought particles that could constitute a Higgs field. They believed success was possible if they could replicate the conditions immediately following the Big Bang. In this environment, they could observe how quarks and leptons behaved and determine if the Higgs boson was also present, providing the mass needed for these particles to form composite structures like protons [source: STFC].
The Large Hadron Collider operates like a high-speed NASCAR track for protons (and occasionally heavy ions). These protons race in opposite directions around a 17-mile (27-kilometer) loop, colliding millions of times per second [source: Greene]. Upon collision, composite particles break apart into quarks and leptons, releasing energy that can reveal the creation of extremely heavy particles.
This is how we begin to 'observe' particles like the Higgs boson. The LHC’s detectors measure the energy and charge of particles resulting from proton collisions. These detectors are massive—the largest stands 82 feet (25 meters) tall and equally wide. Their size is necessary to accommodate the powerful magnets that bend the paths of particles for analysis.
By curving the paths of particles within a magnetic field, we can observe their varying behaviors—particles with high momentum continue in a straight line, while those with lower momentum spiral tightly [source: CERN]. Momentum is a crucial piece of information that helps researchers and physicists identify specific particles.
Tracking devices in detectors are equally useful. These devices capture electronic signals left by particles as they travel through the detector, enabling computers to generate graphical representations of their paths.
Calorimeters within the detectors also play a key role in particle identification. They measure the energy lost by particles post-collision and absorb them within the detector. By studying the radiation emitted, physicists can uncover unique identifiers for specific particles [source: CERN].
So, what does the Higgs boson look like? Unfortunately, it’s invisible to the naked eye—it’s a tiny particle, after all. Instead, we rely on graphs and data. Detectors capture detailed information about particle paths, energy, decay products, and more, which is then translated into precise numerical data. These numbers reveal an "excess of events" that confirm the Higgs boson’s existence [source: CERN].
Don’t be disheartened, though. The team at CERN understands our desire for visual representations. If you’re curious, the CERN website offers graphical simulations of collisions, providing a satisfying glimpse of what the Higgs boson might "look" like in action [source: CERN].
