Buzz
For years, the dairy sector has been battling to remove the term “milk” from products like almond milk. Meanwhile, producers of plant-based beverages argue that naming their products as they see fit is a matter of freedom of expression. Recently, it appears the FDA is leaning toward supporting traditional dairy farmers.
Both sides present valid arguments, though the debate feels somewhat trivial. The FDA commissioner rightly notes that almonds don’t produce milk through lactation. However, no one ever assumed they did.
The term “milk” has historically described whitish liquids not derived from animals. For instance, the creamy liquid extracted from coconuts—often used in Thai cuisine—is known as coconut milk. Similarly, the thistle plant, which secretes a milky sap, is referred to as milk thistle. So, why shouldn’t almond, soy, or oat-based beverages also be called milk?
(Interestingly, there’s now a coconut-based drink sold alongside soy, almond, and rice milks in stores, and it’s also labeled as “coconut milk,” creating quite a bit of confusion.)
Plant-based milks are frequently used as culinary substitutes for dairy milk. They’re poured over cereal, added to coffee, and even fortified with calcium, making them a popular alternative. In response to the ongoing debate, the government refers to these products as “soymilk (soy beverage)” in official contexts.
From a nutritional standpoint, they differ significantly. Dairy milk contains more calories and significantly higher protein levels compared to most plant-based options. Similar to how riced cauliflower isn’t identical to rice or zucchini noodles aren’t the same as pasta, plant-based milks are nutritious but not a direct nutritional substitute for dairy milk.
