Buzz
Ever found yourself tongue-tied in front of a Jackson Pollock painting? Or unsure how to respond to a Rothko piece? This week, Jerry Saltz, Senior Art Critic at New York Magazine, joins us to guide the less art-savvy in the nuances of discussing fine art. He emphasizes that art criticism has no strict rules—it’s all about personal interpretation.
Saltz, a Pulitzer Prize winner and recipient of two National Magazine Awards for his critiques, is set to release his new book, “How to Be an Artist,” this March.
Tune in to The Upgrade above or catch us on popular podcast platforms like Apple Podcasts, Google Play, Spotify, iHeartRadio, Stitcher, and NPR One.
Key Moments from This Week's Episode
Insights from the Jerry Saltz Interview
On the deeply personal essence of art:
Art is inherently subjective. It’s impossible to definitively claim that Leonardo da Vinci surpasses Norman Rockwell as an artist. Rockwell’s brilliance lies in his ability to dictate emotions, guide your gaze, and direct your focus in a specific sequence. However, his work remains static, never evolving. While I can analyze and appreciate both, I cannot objectively declare one superior to the other.
On the absence of 'right' or 'wrong' in art discussions:
I encourage everyone to embrace their inner fool, to wander aimlessly, and to shed the fear of making mistakes. In art, there’s no such thing as being wrong—I assure you. You might dislike my taste, and I might dislike yours, but that’s where fascinating conversations begin. I want people to chase every wild idea in their minds. Imagine it like a kaleidoscope: as a child, you’d peer through it, captivated by the shifting shapes and colors, building entire imaginary worlds with just one eye. That’s how you create entire structures from mere fragments of glass or plastic. When you view art, it’s essentially the same experience.
Got feedback or ideas for us? Interested in being featured on the show? Call us at 347-687-8109 or send a voice memo to [email protected].
