In 1949, beach fashion struck a balance between elegance and structure, bridging the gap between early 20th-century maillots and the bikinis of the 1960s. Tom Kelley Archive/Getty ImagesAt first glance, it might appear as just a piece of stretchy material. More than a swath, it resembles a patch — lightweight, fast-drying, and revealing in design.
The modern swimsuit seems like an inevitable design. Swimming or wading in full clothing is impractical. Yet, for over a century, women did just that, and before that, they often swam without any attire at all.
This journey highlights key milestones along a fascinating path, from minimal attire to bold fashion and back again. It reflects the historical shifts in societal norms, gender roles, cultural exchanges, and the timeless quest to shed weight before beach season.
This makes it even more important to celebrate the daring women of ancient Greece, where our story begins …
Scantily Clad (Ancient Greece/Rome)
Women at Roman baths often wore minimalist bandeaus and briefs, if they chose to wear anything at all!
Matt Cardy/Getty ImagesAncient Greek and Roman bathhouses were far from modest spaces — they were, after all, designed for bathing. Exposing more skin meant achieving greater cleanliness. With separate areas for men and women, concerns about cross-gender exposure were nonexistent.
During this period, spanning roughly 200 B.C. to 500 A.D., women typically bathed either nude or in minimal attire, such as a bandeau-style top and small bottoms. Ancient artwork reveals that these early bikinis closely resemble modern designs, debunking the myth that the bikini was a 1940s invention. (We’ll explore that later.)
The communal bathhouses of antiquity faded with the onset of the Dark Ages, when public bathing fell out of favor. Bathing suits reemerged centuries later during the Victorian era, though they bore little resemblance to their ancient counterparts.
Clad (Late-1700s to 1800s)
Survival of the fittest! French beachwear in the 1880s included full skirts and bloomers for modesty and practicality.
Hulton Archive/Getty ImagesWithout the sight of water or sand, one might never guess that Victorian women were dressed for the beach.
Modesty was highly prized, serving as a marker of social status. Upper-class women, who were the primary beachgoers due to the time and expense involved, wore bathing suits designed to conceal rather than reveal. These early suits were long "bathing dresses," often weighted at the hem to prevent floating and paired with black stockings to maintain propriety.
Some resorts even offered "bathing machines," small wheeled cabins that transported women from the shore to the water, ensuring they were never seen in swimwear by men.
The Victorian bathing suit evolved over time, eventually becoming a one-piece wool jumpsuit with trousers and a shirt. By the end of the 1800s, swimwear began to shift toward functionality ...
Let Them Swim! (Early 1900s)
In the early 20th century, active women abandoned the restrictive stockings, skirts, and long sleeves of earlier swimwear.
Apic/Getty ImagesThe early 20th century saw a shift in gender roles. By 1920, women gained the right to vote, and a decade earlier, they were no longer arrested for revealing their legs and shoulders at the beach.
A significant change was that women began swimming seriously — not just for leisure but also as a competitive sport, both in schools and recreationally.
As a result, swimwear became more practical. Though still made of wool, it was more streamlined. Early 1900s bathing suits were one-piece, tank-style jumpers ending at the thighs, designed to allow freedom of movement in the water.
While not particularly sexy, these suits complemented the boyish figure that was fashionable at the time. By the 1930s, changing beauty standards would reshape swimwear once again …
A Little off the Middle (1930 to 1940s)
The form-fitting, low-cut swimsuits of the 1930s accentuated actress Lana Turner's famously long legs. (High heels certainly added to the effect.)
Gene Lester/Getty ImagesThis era marked the emergence of swimsuits that truly resembled modern designs. The 1930s versions were snug, crafted from water-friendly materials like latex, and featured bare arms and legs, with cuts reaching daring heights.
The thigh-high cut wasn’t universally flattering unless you had legs like Lana Turner, whose figure redefined sensuality in a way previously only seen in risqué magazines.
By the early 1940s, the two-piece swimsuit debuted, though it wasn’t the bikini we know today. Instead, it was essentially a one-piece suit sliced above the navel, revealing a modest strip of midriff.
The exposure of the belly button was a pivotal moment. It was this reveal (and what lay below) that set the stage for the mid-decade scandal, shocking even French models …
Gasp! (Meet the Bikini, 1946)
In 1946, nude dancer Micheline Bernardini was the sole woman bold enough to model the revolutionary bikini in Paris.
Keystone/Getty ImagesWhile French models of the era were known for their liberated attitudes, their refusal to showcase this groundbreaking design speaks volumes. The bikini’s impact on fashion and morality was as explosive as the atomic tests at Bikini Atoll, from which it took its name.
The 1946 bikini shocked the world by daring to expose the navel — a previously forbidden area no respectable woman would reveal in public.
Two designers independently created the bikini, which debuted simultaneously on Cannes beaches during the 1946 film festival and on a Paris runway, modeled by a stripper.
Over the next few years, the bikini gradually gained popularity on European beaches and pools, but in the United States, it was met with widespread disapproval for quite some time. As the 1950s arrived, American women actually moved toward more conservative swimwear …
A Bit of Structure (1950s)
The structured and corseted design of 1950s swimsuits mirrored the era’s fashion, which emphasized cinched waists and formal silhouettes.
Hulton Archive/Getty ImagesThe curvaceous ideal of the 1950s, epitomized by figures like Marilyn Monroe, was seen as achievable, as the saying went, "real women have curves." However, the debate was whether those curves were in the right places.
Another pressing question was what corset manufacturers would do as women increasingly abandoned corsets in their everyday wear.
The solution to both dilemmas was the structured swimsuit of the 1950s. This one-piece design featured built-in corsetry, including boning in the bodice to flatten the stomach, accentuate the waist, enhance the bust, and ensure the suit stayed secure in the water. Its low-cut leg, though unflattering for many "real women," offered additional modesty for mixed-gender sunbathing.
And then, to everyone’s astonishment, the 1960s arrived...
Yay! (Meet the Bikini, 1960)
Tiny and daring, indeed. Julie Newmar showcased the suddenly essential bikini in the 1960s.
Hulton Archive/Getty ImagesThe design that sparked nationwide outrage in the 1940s became a cultural phenomenon as the 1960s unfolded.
By the early 1960s, it had become not only acceptable but also fairly common to see young women wearing bikinis at beaches and backyard pools. The rise of private pools likely played a role, offering women a secluded space to grow comfortable with such revealing attire.
The 1960s bikini was relatively modest by modern standards: the tops fully covered the bust, and the bottoms extended from just below the navel to the upper thigh, typically without being skin-tight. This changed around mid-decade when a swimwear revolution occurred. By 1965, advancements in textiles transformed everything …
Like a Glove -- Lycra/Spandex (1960s)
The introduction of Lycra in 1965 revolutionized swimsuits, making them stretchy, quick-drying, and even more form-fitting. Here, Salvador Dali kisses the hand of Raquel Welch.
Hulton Archive/Getty ImagesIn the mid-1960s, swimsuits became more revealing, not through cuts but through the use of new materials that clung tightly to the body, showcasing more than ever before.
Spandex entered the swimwear market around 1965 and became an instant sensation. Swimsuits now had a shiny appearance when dry, a glistening look when wet, and left little to the imagination in either state. It was a nightmare for modesty if the weather suddenly turned chilly.
The second-skin swimsuit we recognize today was born, celebrated for its quick-drying properties and ease of movement in the water.
In the 1970s, designers pushed the boundaries of skimpy swimwear, using the daring fabric to create styles that seemed to reach the limits of minimalism. This trend immortalized Farrah Fawcett on countless bedroom walls …
More Skin! (1970s)
Farrah Fawcett's iconic red swimsuit was added to the Smithsonian's collection on February 2, 2011.
Leigh Vogel/FilmMagic/Getty ImagesThe 1970s embraced free love, bidding farewell to bras, modesty, and traditional decency. Swimwear followed suit, with hemlines creeping higher on young women everywhere.
The high-cut legs of the 1970s weren’t as extreme as those of the 1980s, but they revealed far more than the 1960s bikini bottoms. String bikinis emerged, offering what seemed like the bare minimum coverage, while even one-pieces showcased previously unseen skin. Farrah Fawcett’s iconic red tank suit, with its tantalizing upper thigh reveal, became a staple on bedroom walls for years. Notably, this suit was donated to the Smithsonian in 2011.
In more recent decades, swimwear design has evolved to make Fawcett’s suit appear modest. The 1980s and, especially, the 1990s drew inspiration from Brazil, introducing beachgoers to a bold new era of, well, cheeky styles …
Shameless (1990s)
The red tank suits from "Baywatch" epitomized 1990s swimwear: high-cut legs and low-cut tops.
Fotos International/Getty ImagesNude beaches are rare in the United States, but in today’s world, who really needs them?
The 1980s saw the near-disappearance of full butt coverage, and side-boob became publicly acceptable for the first time. Thanks, "Baywatch"! The 1990s pushed boundaries even further, introducing Brazilian-inspired beachwear — like tangas, thongs, and barely-there triangle tops — along with the waxing trends that accompanied them.
But those tiny pieces of fabric matter: there’s a significant distinction between wearing nothing and wearing a swimsuit. How much a woman chooses to reveal might say something about her — or perhaps it says nothing at all. No one knows for sure, and that’s the beauty of it.
