This would be considered a large-scale operation.
Photo courtesy: Thinkstock/Getty ImagesIn films about archaeology and paleontology, there's rarely a focus on the time spent raising funds. While Indiana Jones may have a countdown due to his race against Nazis, his schedule doesn't follow the constraints of his funding. In reality, Dr. Jones never seems concerned about budgetary issues. Actual archaeologists often wish for such scenarios, but they face tight deadlines determined by their available funding.
The time it takes to excavate an archaeological site largely depends on the available budget for the excavation team. If the diggers had their way, they might never stop working, but like all sciences, archaeology comes at a cost. Before even starting most digs, there must be sufficient funding. The project's budget typically defines how long the dig will last. Ideally, the funds will allow the team enough time to uncover everything they aim for, though real-life digs are rarely focused on finding just one item as in films. Most sites are chosen because they have the potential to reveal many artifacts, but in some cases, a single item may be the goal, and the excavation will continue until it is found, as long as the budget holds up.
Here’s a general idea of how a dig works: a site is identified, and the archaeologist is eager to begin the excavation. Depending on whether they’re employed by a museum, university, or working independently, there are various ways they can secure funding. Museums and universities typically have existing budgets or ongoing grants that provide annual funding. For example, the University of Pittsburgh receives funding from the Heinz Grant Program for Latin American Archaeology, which offers 10 grants annually, each worth $8,000. Suppose you are a researcher at Pittsburgh. You can apply for one of these grants and choose a site that fits within that budget. For example, there might be a Native American site in Pennsylvania, allowing for a two-month dig. Or perhaps you’re drawn to Egypt, but the same budget only covers a one-week trip.
If the funding comes from a well-funded government body or museum, you might be able to continue digging as long as necessary. However, starting from scratch typically takes much longer than working on a site that has already been partially excavated. Excavation is not just about bringing in large machinery and speeding up the process; it's a careful job of digging one layer of earth at a time. The depth at which objects are found is key in helping archaeologists date them.
Managing and organizing a new excavation project is a massive task. Equipment and staff are brought in, sometimes staying on-site in tents, and the surrounding area is cleared of vegetation when needed. The archaeologists then create a plan for the site, mapping out the excavation zones, and the process begins. Once the excavation is underway, it’s a slow, meticulous process to safeguard the site and the artifacts found. The team thoroughly sifts through every bucket of dirt to recover valuable objects, logging and sometimes photographing them before removing them. This process can be extremely slow, and even a small site may take a full week or longer to excavate. If the site is of significant interest, managing local, national, or even international media can extend the excavation time.
For large, government-protected sites, excavations can continue as long as the funding holds. For example, the Presidio in San Francisco, the location of an 18th-century Spanish fort, has an ongoing, year-round excavation, supported by a volunteer program through the National Park Service. Other sites have adopted a similar volunteer-based approach after the primary excavation phase ended. The Crow Canyon Archaeological Center in Cortez, Colorado, continues to allow visitors to participate in a dig that officially concluded in 2007. Ultimately, the duration of a dig depends less on the time required and more on how long the funding will last.
