1. Explanation of 'Understanding the Emotional Elements in Argumentative Writing' – Version 4


2. Essay on "Understanding the Emotional Elements in Argumentative Writing" No. 5


3. Essay on "Understanding the Expressive Elements in Argumentative Writing" No. 6
I. KEY CONCEPTS TO REMEMBER
Expressive elements are crucial in argumentative writing. They enhance the persuasive power of the text by stirring the emotions of the reader (or listener). For an argumentative essay to be emotionally compelling, the writer must genuinely feel for what they are writing (or saying) and be able to convey these feelings through emotionally charged words and phrases. The expression of emotion must be sincere and should not disrupt the logical flow of the argument.
II. GUIDELINES FOR ANSWERING QUESTIONS
Question 1. The text "The Call for National Resistance".
a) The author's emotions are conveyed through exclamatory and imperative words like: "O fellow citizens!" "O soldiers, self-defense forces, and militia!" "No! We must rise up, we must sacrifice until the last drop of blood to defend the country." The same expressive language is used in the text "The General’s Appeal to the Troops" by Tran Quoc Tuan, making both texts similar in this regard.
b) Why these texts are considered argumentative: The main purpose of both "The General’s Appeal to the Troops" and "The Call for National Resistance" is to present arguments and ideas to persuade others through a logical system of reasoning. The expressive elements only serve to add vibrancy and make the text more memorable; they are not the primary focus.
c) Comparative analysis: When comparing the two versions, the sentences in the second column are more effective due to the use of expressive elements. Thus, these emotional components make the text livelier and more engaging, increasing its persuasive impact.
Question 2. How can we maximize the impact of expressive elements in argumentative writing? To make the most of the expressive power in argumentative texts, writers should consider the following factors:
a) The writer must have a deep, sincere emotional connection with the subject matter. At the same time, these emotions must be expressed through logically structured, scientifically sound arguments.
b) The writer needs to possess literary skill, keen observation, and a rich imagination to craft sentences that are emotionally resonant.
c) Using too many emotional words or adding too many exclamatory sentences does not necessarily increase the emotional value. It’s about using the right words in the right context, avoiding overuse, and steering clear of clichéd expressions.
III. PRACTICE EXERCISES
Question 1. Identify the expressive elements in Part I – War and the Natives ("Blood Tax") and explain the techniques used to express them. What is the emotional effect of these techniques?
+ Expressive elements:
- Expressive words: "dirty black people", "dirty Annamites", "joyous war", "beloved children", "dear friends", "soldiers fighting for justice and freedom".
- Expressive imagery: "sinking to the ocean depths to defend the nation like sea monsters", "leaving their bodies in remote, idyllic regions", "dying while wondering if Motherland wants to claim the place of the consort in the Sultan’s palace", "using their blood to water laurel wreaths".
+ Expressive techniques: Using words with opposites, and applying deep, metaphorical comparisons, heightening the emotional impact.
+ Effect: These elements expose the fraudulent, deceitful nature of the French colonizers, enhancing the text's persuasiveness. It creates a strong satirical effect.
Question 2. Read the following argumentative passage and identify the emotions expressed. How did the author ensure that these passages were both logically persuasive and emotionally compelling?
+ Emotions expressed in the passage:
- The anguish of a teacher (“the profession of teaching the mother tongue”).
- The sorrow over the deterioration of literary education and writing skills among students today.
- The indignation toward the practice of rote learning.
+ Emotional techniques:
- Words and phrases: The use of emotional words like "profession", "rote learning" creates strong feelings of empathy and frustration.
- Tone: The tone is a blend of personal reflection and indignation, critiquing the system.
Question 3. Write an argumentative paragraph on the topic: "We should not rely on rote memorization or guesswork in learning". Ensure that the paragraph has both sound reasoning and emotional resonance.
Rote memorization and cramming are flawed learning methods. Rote learning makes us memorize without truly understanding the material, repeating it mechanically like a parrot, without any comprehension. As for cramming, it’s simply learning what we think is likely to appear on an exam, not to truly grasp the knowledge. If we don’t encounter the material we studied, we are immediately stumped by our own "preparedness". Therefore, we should avoid rote memorization and cramming as they hinder genuine learning and critical thinking.


4. Essay on "Exploring the Expressive Elements in Argumentative Writing" No. 1
I. Expressive Elements in Argumentative Writing
Question 1 (Page 95, Literature 8th Grade, Volume 2): Read the text and answer the following question.
a. The words expressing the author's intense emotions in the essay:
- Key expressions: "Desire for peace," "must make concessions," "growing aggression," "determined to conquer our land," "willing to sacrifice," "will not accept defeat," "sacrifice until the last drop of blood," "victory will surely belong to our people."
- Exclamatory sentences:
+ "O people of the nation!"
+ "O comrades in arms, self-defense forces, and militia!"
+ "No! We would rather sacrifice everything than lose our nation or live as slaves."
The Call for National Resistance and The General’s Appeal to the Troops both share the use of emotive language and expressive sentences.
b. However, both The General’s Appeal and The Call for National Resistance are argumentative texts, not purely expressive, because their primary purpose is to argue and motivate, with expressive elements merely enhancing their persuasive power.
c. The sentences in column (2) are more effective than those in column (1), despite conveying the same information, because the arguments in column (2) are reinforced by expressive elements.
Summary
Question 2 (Page 96, Literature 8th Grade, Volume 2): Methods to maximize the impact of expressive elements in argumentative writing:
- Clear and coherent arguments must be established.
- The writer must genuinely feel emotion about the topic being discussed.
- Those emotions should be expressed with vivid and impactful language.
- Simply using a lot of emotive words and exclamatory sentences doesn’t necessarily increase emotional impact—authentic emotion and resonance are key, not just embellishments in language.
II. Practice Exercises
Question 1 (Page 97, Literature 8th Grade, Volume 2): Identify the expressive elements in Part I – War and the "Natives":
- Contrasting elements:
+ "dirty black men," "dirty Annamites" vs. "beloved children," "dear friends," "soldiers defending justice and freedom"
+ "joyful war, sudden glory" vs. "sudden separation from families, bodies left on the battlefield"
+ "amazing science of torpedo displays" vs. "sinking to the ocean’s depths to protect the homeland like sea monsters"
- High symbolic imagery:
+ "abandoning bodies in peaceful, remote lands"
+ "using their own blood to water laurel wreaths, turning their bones into weapons"
+ "spitting out pieces of lung"
- Tone: At times, bitterly ironic and mocking, at other times sorrowful and compassionate.
Effect: Persuades the reader to empathize with the author’s perspective, to despise the cruelty and deception of colonial powers, and to feel pity for the suffering of the people.
Question 2 (Page 97, Literature 8th Grade, Volume 2): The sadness over the phenomenon of rote learning and memorization among students:
- Frustration and concern regarding the state of education in the country.
The excerpt not only appeals to logic but also evokes strong emotion:
+ Tone of concern and distress.
+ Sentences structured as rhetorical questions, subtly revealing the author’s attitude and hidden pain: "How can we explain this?", "Why is there no printing house...", "Why can't there be a 'factory' producing..."
+ Emotive language used extensively: "deep concern," "burdened with this 'profession,'" "years passing by," "no reason," "like a parrot," "unnecessary effort," "forcing children to go to school every day."
Question 3 (Page 98, Literature 8th Grade, Volume 2): We should not rely on rote memorization or cramming. Learning is about truly understanding and absorbing knowledge. If we only memorize or cram, we retain information for a very short time and forget it quickly. The prevalence of cramming and rote learning in today’s schools is worrying. Students memorize just to pass exams, not to gain knowledge. If students don’t grasp the core concepts, how can they retain the knowledge or achieve good results in the long term? Rote learning and cramming waste both time and educational opportunities.


5. Essay on "Exploring the Expressive Elements in Argumentative Writing" No. 2
Part I: EXPRESSIVE ELEMENTS IN ARGUMENTATIVE WRITING
Question 1 (Page 96, Textbook of Vietnamese Literature 8, Volume 2)
Upon studying the text "The Call to National Resistance," we observe the following:
a. The text contains many words and sentences that express strong emotions: Words such as: to desire peace, one must compromise, persist in resistance, determined to defend our country, willing to sacrifice, never give up, must fight until the last drop of blood, victory is certainly ours.- Exclamatory sentences: + Oh, my fellow citizens of the nation! + Oh, my comrades in arms, self-defense forces, and militia! The way words are used in both "The Call to National Resistance" by Ho Chi Minh and "The General's Edict" by Tran Quoc Tuan are similar in their use of powerful, emotional language to convey their message.b. However, these two texts are not purely expressive writings. Their main purpose is argumentative: to call for action, express opinions, and define right from wrong. The expressive elements merely serve to enhance the persuasiveness of the arguments presented.c. The sentences in Column 2 are more effective than those in Column 1 because they contain more emotionally charged words and expressions, thus enriching the emotional tone of the writing.Question 2 (Page 96, Textbook of Vietnamese Literature 8, Volume 2)
After analyzing texts like "The General's Edict" and "The Call to National Resistance," answer the following: How can one fully leverage the expressive elements in argumentative writing?
a) Does the writer need to only think critically about the thesis and arguments, or must they also be emotionally moved by the subject matter?
b) Is mere emotional resonance enough? Does deep patriotism and hatred for the enemy naturally lead to expressions such as: "No! We will sacrifice everything..." or "To speak with strength..."? What additional qualities does the writer need to create such phrases?
c) Some say: The more expressive words and exclamatory sentences used, the greater the emotional impact in argumentative writing.
Is this viewpoint correct? Why?
Answer:
When writing an argumentative essay, the writer presents reasons and evidence aimed at influencing the reader’s thoughts, emotions, and actions to convince them to agree with their perspective and act accordingly. Therefore, expressive elements are necessary in argumentative writing. They help make the text more persuasive by emotionally engaging the reader.
In argumentative writing, expressive elements manifest in various forms:
- Affirmative or negative statements.
- Expression of emotions (love, hate, anger, admiration, praise, worry, trust…).
- Tone (strong, forceful, or heartfelt and emotional).
To create emotionally engaging argumentative writing, the writer must genuinely feel a strong connection to the issue they are addressing. They must also be able to express these emotions through words and sentences that evoke empathy. These emotions must be authentic, arising from the writer’s true feelings.
a) When writing an argumentative essay, in addition to developing the main argument and reasoning, the writer must persuade the reader to believe in those ideas. Therefore, the writer must first have sincere feelings, deeply moved by the topic at hand.
b) However, emotions alone are insufficient. These emotions must be conveyed through appropriate words, sentences, and tone, capturing the reader’s interest and engaging them.
c) Although expressive elements are highly important, they should not be overused. Overloading the essay with emotional words can dilute the main argument, making it difficult for the reader to follow the core reasoning. Argumentative writing is not purely expressive; the expressive elements are supportive. To be effective, expressive elements must be used sparingly and strategically.
Part II: PRACTICE
Question 1 (Page 97, Textbook of Vietnamese Literature 8, Volume 2)
Identify the expressive elements in Section I – War and the Indigenous People (from the text "Blood Tax") and explain the methods the author uses to express these emotions. What is the impact of these expressive elements?
Answer:
The expressive elements in Section I – War and "The Indigenous People" are illustrated through the use of contrasting words or satirical, mocking expressions.
- Opposing elements:
+ dirty black men, filthy "An-nam-mits" > < loving "children", "dear friends", freedom fighters defending justice
+ joyful, glorious war suddenly > < suddenly separated from wives and children, left to die on the battlefield
+ the magical science of launching torpedoes > < going to the bottom of the sea to protect the homeland from sea monsters
- Sarcastic tone:
+ leaving bodies in desolate, poetic lands
+ watering wreaths with one’s own blood, shaping staffs from one’s bones
+ coughing out pieces of lung
=> These vivid expressive elements heighten the satirical and ironic nature of the text, enhancing its persuasive impact and making it more compelling for the reader to understand the deceitful and inhumane behavior of the French colonizers in using local people as cannon fodder during unjust wars.
Question 2 (Page 97, Textbook of Vietnamese Literature 8, Volume 2)
Read the following passage and explain: What emotions are conveyed in the text? How has the author made the passage not only intellectually persuasive but also emotionally compelling?
Answer:
- The passage conveys the author’s sorrow over the practice of rote memorization and mechanical learning among students. This reflects the inner turmoil and concern of an educator regarding a troubling reality in the educational system.
- The passage is not just intellectually convincing but also emotionally charged with a tone of reflection and concern. The rhetorical questions subtly reveal the author’s attitude and pain: "How can we explain this?" "Why isn’t there a "publisher" to print this out?" The repeated use of words expressing feelings (heartache, burden, years, no reason, like a parrot, pointless, forcing children to go to school daily) deepens the expression of sorrow and worry over this harmful situation, which could have a significant impact on the country’s future.
Question 3 (Page 97, Textbook of Vietnamese Literature 8, Volume 2)
Write an argumentative paragraph to present the point: "We should not engage in rote learning and mechanical memorization" while ensuring the paragraph is logically sound and emotionally persuasive.
Answer:
To answer this, students must first explain what rote learning and mechanical memorization mean. They should then discuss the negative consequences of these practices for both individuals and society. To make the paragraph emotionally engaging, the writer must critique the harmful educational methods and emphasize the importance of critical, thoughtful learning. The central point is that students should adopt a positive and effective approach to studying, one that aligns with the growing demands of society, focusing not just on hard work, but on methodical and scientific approaches to learning.


6. Lesson Plan "Understanding the Role of Expressive Elements in Argumentative Writing" - Part 3
I - BASIC KNOWLEDGE TO MASTER
Question 1. To influence the reader's perception, emotions, and actions, argumentative writing does not always rely solely on rational elements but also requires the use of expressive features. These elements enhance the persuasive power of argumentative writing by appealing more effectively to the reader's emotions. For argumentative writing to be emotionally impactful, the writer must genuinely feel and resonate with the issues being discussed. If the emotions expressed are artificial or shallow, the writing loses its persuasive power. Argumentative writing can only move the reader emotionally through the writer's authentic emotional response to the topic presented.
Question 2. Writers must have the ability to use language, sentence structure, and imagery effectively to convey their emotional state vividly and accurately. Therefore, to make an argumentative essay emotionally rich, the writer must ensure both the argumentative quality of the piece, meaning it must persuade the reader logically, and also appeal to the reader's emotions.
II - GUIDELINES FOR STUDYING THE TEXT
Question 1. When studying the text 'Call for National Resistance,' we observe:
a) The text includes many words and sentences that strongly express the author's emotions:
- Words: peace must be won, must make concessions, intensifying the aggression, determined to invade our country, would rather sacrifice, absolutely not, must sacrifice to the last drop of blood, victory will certainly belong to our people.
- Sentences (exclamatory):
+ Oh, compatriots nationwide!
+ Oh, soldiers, self-defense forces, and militias!
+ No! We would rather sacrifice everything than lose our country, than become slaves.
The use of emotionally charged language in both 'Call for National Resistance' by President Ho Chi Minh and 'The Memorial to the General' by Tran Quoc Tuan is similar, as both employ powerful and emotionally expressive words and sentences to present their arguments.
b) However, both texts are argumentative rather than emotional. They were not written to express personal feelings but to persuade the reader’s rational mind on issues of right and wrong. The emotional features serve only to strengthen the persuasive power of the arguments presented.
c) The sentences in column 2 are more emotionally evocative than those in column 1 because they contain words that reveal the author's attitude and emotional investment more strongly, making them richer in literary and emotional quality. For example, if the author wrote 'The envoy walks on the street,' the reader would only receive a factual account. But when the author writes 'The envoy swaggered arrogantly on the street,' the reader perceives not only the event but also the author’s anger and contempt toward it, making the sentence more emotionally charged.
Question 2. By studying both 'Call for National Resistance' and 'The Memorial to the General,' we learn:
- When writing an argumentative essay, one must consider not only the logical construction of the argument but also the emotional resonance. Argumentation must influence both the mind and the heart of the reader. The argument and logic primarily appeal to the reader’s intellect, helping them gain clarity on the issue. However, to impact their emotions, the writer must feel deeply about the issue. If the emotions are contrived or superficial, the language will come across as forced, making it impossible to engage the reader’s heart or mind effectively.
- Not all argumentative essays that use expressive language or exclamatory sentences necessarily become emotionally powerful, because:
+ Emotional expressions and exclamations are just supplementary elements in argumentative writing.
+ To have emotional value, such expressions must be used at the right moment and in the right context.
+ Emotional expressions are only valuable when they stem from genuine feelings, not from superficial or embellished rhetoric.
III - EXERCISES
Question 1. a) The emotional elements in 'War and the Natives' (excerpt from 'Blood Tax') are demonstrated through opposing phrases or sarcasm:
- filthy black men, filthy 'Annamites' <-> beloved 'children', noble 'friends', fighters defending justice and freedom
- joyous, honorable war <-> suddenly torn from families, corpses lying in warfields
- the miraculous display of scientific torpedo launches <-> sinking to the bottom of the sea to defend the homeland against monstrous sea creatures
- abandoning corpses in desolate lands
- watering wreaths with one’s blood, shaping staffs with one’s bones
- coughing up pieces of lungs
b) The purpose of these terms:
They vividly illustrate the deceitful, hypocritical nature and malicious plans of the French colonists in exploiting the local people as cannon fodder in unjust wars. These words enhance the satire and irony of the writing, making its impact and persuasive power more potent.
Question 2. This excerpt conveys the following primary emotions of the author:
- The sorrow of the author, a devoted teacher, lamenting the phenomenon of rote memorization among students.
- The author's deep distress and concern over a troubling reality in the educational system at the time.
This passage not only appeals to reason but also resonates emotionally because:
- The tone is filled with personal reflections, expressing the author’s anxiety and inner turmoil.
- The use of rhetorical questions reflects the author’s concealed sorrow:
+ How can one explain...
+ There is no reason to pencil...
+ Why isn’t there a publishing house to release...
- Words expressing attitude and emotion frequently appear, such as: anguish, burdened with a 'profession,' years of experience, meaningless, like a parrot, no need for further hassle, forcing children to attend school every day, etc.
Question 3. Students should complete this task independently.
Suggestions:
a) Clarify the concept:
Rote memorization: learning without understanding
- 'Study the syllabus':
+ Studying specific content expected to be tested
+ Study as a form of evasion
b) Analyze the harms of rote memorization and selective study:
- It does not allow for real knowledge acquisition, nor does it foster creativity or intelligence.
- The knowledge gained is shallow and distorted.
- When faced with questions that require critical thinking or knowledge outside the syllabus, the student will fail and score poorly.
- Rote learning and selective study hinder progress and long-term success.


