Hướng dẫn chi tiết về đề IELTS Writing ngày 26/02/2022

IELTS Writing Task 1

Example

The bar chart illustrates the percentages of students who learned to play four different types of musical instruments across three distinct years: 2005, 2010, and 2015.

In general, except for the violin, significantly more students learned these instruments in 2015 compared to previous years. Additionally, the guitar and piano remained the most popular choices throughout the years under review.

Back in 2005, approximately 11% of students were learning to play the guitar, piano, or violin, whereas only 5% were focusing on the drums. By 2010, the guitar and piano had nearly doubled in popularity, with over 20% and 18% of students, respectively, opting to learn them. During the same period, the proportion of students learning the drums remained constant, while those learning the violin experienced a slight decline.

By 2015, the number of students studying the guitar had increased by about 10%, while those learning the piano had more than doubled to almost 40%. Furthermore, although the percentage of students learning the drums saw a slight increase to 8%, the percentage of those learning the violin decreased significantly to only 5%.

Analysis

In general, the number of students learning musical instruments has increased, except for the violin. 

Đoạn body 1 so sánh các loại nhạc cụ năm 2005 (guitar, piano, violin cao hơn trống); Đồng thời thể hiện sự tăng trưởng về phần trăm của các nhạc cụ này từ 2005 đến 2010. → Lưu ý luôn so sánh về cả chiều dọc (số liệu trong cùng một năm) và chiều ngang (số liệu giữa các năm với nhau) để bố cục bài chặt chẽ.

Đoạn body 2 tập trung mô tả số liệu năm 2015, thể hiện sự đối lập giữa guitar, piano, drum (tăng) và violin (giảm).

IELTS Writing Task 2

Example

Undoubtedly, wild creatures are at risk of extinction today, and authorities are working to put in place critical safeguards to protect them. However, I believe that humans devote far too much time and resources to saving wildlife. There are several important reasons supporting this viewpoint which would be discussed objectively during the course of this essay.

To begin with, wild animals do not appear to have the same impact on humans as other animals. Plants that create oxygen, absorb carbon dioxide, and maintain the earth’s climate are a good example. People may not have enough oxygen to breathe when they’re on the verge of extinction. As a result, human survival could be jeopardized. In contrast, when dinosaurs vanished in the past, humans continued to develop at a rapid pace, as they do today. People, in my interpretation, usually protect animals out of ethical concerns. As a result, humans should not go overboard in any effort to save them.

Additionally, governments should allocate significant resources to addressing other, more urgent issues. For instance, there are still numerous disadvantaged individuals worldwide who lack basic necessities such as food, healthcare, and education, or who suffer from untreated life-threatening illnesses like HIV and cancer. Therefore, governments should prioritize assisting people rather than focusing solely on helping other species.

Finally, authorities can come up with some simple solutions for protecting wild animals. For instance, government leaders can build awareness of saving wildlife and impose some heavy punishments for poachers who damage wild animals. In this way, governments can save a large amount of money from this solution.

Finally, I strongly believe that wild animals and birds must be protected. Authorities, on the other hand, cannot afford to be extravagant in order to save them.

Vocabulary:

• Safeguard (n): biện pháp bảo hộ
• Be on the verge of extinction: bên bờ vực tuyệt chủng
• Be jeopardized (adj): bị ảnh hưởng nghiêm trọng
• Ethical concern (n): vấn đề về đạo đức
• Poacher (n): người săn trộm
• Extravagant (adj): phung phí quá mức 

Phân tích

Bài báo cho thấy con người đang tập trung quá nhiều vào việc bảo vệ động vật hoang dã. 

Đoạn body đầu tiên giải thích việc động vật hoang dã không ảnh hưởng trực tiếp đến đời sống con người, mà thay vào đó thực vật mới tác động đến sự sống con người qua việc cung cấp oxy. Động vật hoang dã mặc dù có thể ở trên đà tuyệt chủng nhưng con người vẫn có thể phát triển nếu không có sự tồn tại của chúng (ví dụ về khủng long). Việc bảo vệ này thường dựa trên các giá trị về đạo đức hơn là giá trị thực tiễn.