[MASTER THE EXAM] 解析 đề thi Writing ngày 19/11/2022

Bài viết Task 1 IELTS Writing

Example

The process demonstrates the construction of a storage area using concrete canvas.

Overall, this multi-step process is quite complex, starting with the creation of a concrete canvas, followed by the construction of a vault using the canvas, and finally, the utilization of the structure as a storage facility.

In the initial stage, three different materials are combined to create the concrete canvas. A fiber material is applied to the surface, dry concrete forms the middle layer, and waterproofing is applied to the bottom layer. The concrete canvas is then transported to another location by trucks where it will be unpacked.

Afterward, the concrete canvas is attached to one end of a rope, which is then tied to a truck. Once the canvas is dragged for 10 meters by the truck, pegs are inserted into each of its four corners to secure it to the ground. A door is installed at the front of the tent after inflating the canvas to a height of 8 meters with a compressor. Water is sprayed onto the canvas to solidify it. The concrete canvas tent must then remain for 20 to 24 hours to allow the interior to harden before it can be used for storage purposes.

Analysis

This Process essay has several differences compared to typical process essays. The most notable difference is that the canvas part is produced in only one initial step, so all subsequent steps are merely transportation and installation processes.

Looking at the overall picture, this essay can be divided into 3 main parts:

• Sản xuất ra concrete canvas
• Vận chuyển và bày ra tại nơi cần thi công
• Thi công và đưa vào sử dụng

Bài viết Task 2 IELTS Writing

Example

The subject of history, according to a reasonable group of people, is the reflection of the past and the teacher for the future. Others, however, place less significance on studying history and place more emphasis on studying and practising disciplines and professions like science, the arts, technology, engineering, and so forth. During the course of this essay, I would analyse both perspectives in an objective manner before drawing a rational conclusion.

From the first point of view, it is widely accepted that the process of learning history consists of studying and memorising important dates, names of historic figures, events, causes and results and so on. To a certain extent, the main reason why people study history outside of the academic sphere is either to pass the exams at schools or to satisfy their curiosity which is not particularly important in the current world. Besides, the relevance of understanding how ancient people survived in the current environment is negligible. The same is true with inventions; understanding earlier inventions has minimal bearing on the development of new inventions, which could be extremely complicated rather than intuitive.

On the one hand, history gives people the chance to learn about the past society, culture, significant local, national, and international events, as well as the results of significant decisions, wars, social transformations, and so forth. According to a widely acknowledged opinion, those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it; thus, the benefit of history is to prepare for the future. For instance, most wars and conflicts during the course of history have been dissected meticulously in order to provide a guideline regarding things that should be avoided to not ignite a conflict. Besides, by knowing the magnitude of the impacts of natural disasters in ancient times, communities in vulnerable areas could have a well-prepared mindset.

In summary, both viewpoints have validity within their respective contexts. Therefore, the decision should be based on the individual's circumstances.

Vocab:

• Discipline (n): môn học, ngành học
• The academic sphere (n): giới học thuật
• Negligible (adj): kém quan trọng, không cần quan tâm
• Minimal bearing (n): tác động tối thiểu
• Dissect (v): phân tách
• Ignite (v): kích động

Analysis

This is an essay belonging to the Discuss Both Views type. According to reputable sources, the Discuss Both Views type is introduced with the purpose of requiring writers to focus on explaining the reasons for the existence of two viewpoints presented in the essay. Therefore, personal opinions (if any) should be placed in the conclusion. In other words, this essay type demands higher objectivity compared to Agree/Disagree type and similar ones.

Mở bài bao gồm:

• Paraphrase lại 2 quan điểm trên đề bài 
• Câu dẫn vào nội dung chính của thân bài, theo hướng khái quát hóa.

Thân bài 1:

Focusing on the perspective that learning history is unnecessary:

• Quan điểm 1: học lịch sử trừ giới nghiên cứu ra thì không có giá trị rõ ràng
• Quan điểm 2: khoa học ngày nay phát triển quá nhanh, lịch sử hoàn toàn không thể hiện dc nguồn cảm hứng hay bài học gì đáng kể

Thân bài 2:

Focusing on the value perspective of history

• Quan điểm chính: những người không nắm được lịch sử sẽ lặp lại sai lầm của lịch sử
• Ví dụ 1: chiến tranh và xung đột
• Ví dụ 2: thiên tai và cách ứng phó

• Cả 2 quan điểm điều đúng
• Việc quyết định là do tùy cá nhân và hoàn cảnh nhất định