Phát triển ý cho IELTS Writing thông qua việc học từ ghép | Chủ đề khám phá không gian (space exploration)

Viết một bài IELTS Writing có thể là một thách thức, đặc biệt là khi chúng ta đang xử lý chủ đề khó nhằn như thám hiểm không gian. Để truyền đạt được suy nghĩ của mình một cách rõ ràng, việc nắm vững một lượng từ vựng phong phú và biết cách sử dụng chúng một cách chính xác là điều cần thiết.

Các đề viết liên quan đến chủ đề khám phá không gian

• Many argue that space exploration is a necessity for the progression of human knowledge and technological advancement. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• Some people feel that the cost of space exploration is far too high for the benefits it brings while others argue that space programmes should continue no matter what the cost. Discuss both sides and give your opinion?

• Recently, there has been a significant increase in private investment in space exploration. Is this a positive or a negative development?

• The exploration of space requires a substantial allocation of resources and brings about potential risks but also may lead to invaluable scientific discoveries and technological advancement. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?

• Some scientists think that there are intelligent life forms on other planets and messages should be sent to contact them. Other scientists think that it is a bad idea and would be dangerous. Discuss both views and give your own opinions. 

• Governments around the world have been spending a significant portion of their budgets on space exploration. What are the reasons, and is this a positive or a negative development?

Từ ghép về chủ đề khám phá không gian

Bản đồ tư duy từ ghép về chủ đề khám phá không gian

Dưới đây là 2 mind maps mẫu và rất hữu ích đối với các học viên còn gặp vấn đề về phát triển ý. Các ý bao trùm có thể tạo ra câu luận điểm hay bởi tính khái quát của nó, và các ý nó sẽ tạo thành phần luận cứ chặt chẽ và thuyết phục.

Bản đồ tư duy 1: Các lợi ích và vấn đề đáng quan ngại của trí tuệ nhân tạo (AI)

Or

Bản đồ tư duy 2: Những lo ngại về vấn đề an ninh của trí tuệ nhân tạo và cách xử lý chúng 

Người học hoàn toàn có thể phối hợp các ý trong 2 mind maps trên để giải quyết các dạng bài khác nhau có liên quan.

Thực hành

Ex 2: Fill in the appropriate collocations in the blanks

Profit-oriented companies public scrutiny reusable rockets human costs

government resources wealthy entities space industry private investment

The recent surge in private investment in space exploration, with companies such as SpaceX and Blue Origin leading the charge, has certainly altered the landscape of the (1) _____________. There are compelling arguments for considering this as both a positive and negative development, but overall, I am inclined to view this trend as a beneficial change.

The increased investment by private entities into space exploration, in my opinion, is predominantly a positive development. Primarily, it has led to increased competition, which drives innovation and efficiency. Notably, SpaceX has revolutionized space travel with (2) _____________, drastically cutting costs and making space more accessible. Furthermore, these private firms are also bringing in fresh perspectives and dynamism, often willing to take calculated risks that government agencies might avoid due to bureaucratic red tape or (3) _____________. This has led to ambitious projects like planning manned missions to Mars, which can spur technological advancements and expand the boundaries of human knowledge.

Moreover, (4) _____________ frees up government resources, allowing them to focus on deep space exploration and scientific research, while private companies can cater to commercial and tourism aspects. This can lead to a symbiotic relationship, where government agencies and private firms each play to their strengths, benefiting space exploration as a whole.

However, there are valid concerns that make this trend potentially negative. One issue is the possibility of space becoming the 'Wild West' of the future, with private companies vying for resources and territories without proper regulatory oversight. There's a risk that space, the shared heritage of humanity, could be monopolized by a few (5) _____________.

Additionally, commercialization could potentially detract from the scientific and exploratory spirit of space missions. (6) _____________ may prioritize lucrative projects over those that enhance scientific understanding but offer little monetary return.

Lastly, while private firms are pushing boundaries, their risk-taking can also result in failures with substantial financial and (7) _____________. Therefore, adequate safety standards and regulatory measures are essential to ensure the responsible conduct of these private entities.

In conclusion, the surge in private investment in space exploration has potential benefits such as driving innovation and freeing up (8) _____________. However, it also raises concerns around space's commercialization and the lack of regulatory oversight. Thus, while I view this development as positive, it is critical to establish and enforce international regulations to ensure space remains a frontier for exploration and knowledge enhancement, not a battleground for resource monopolization.

Ex 3: Create an outline and write a comprehensive answer for this topic. Write a minimum of 250 words.

Some people believe that space exploration can uncover solutions to Earth's pressing problems, while others argue it is a waste of resources that could be better used to solve problems on Earth. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.

Đáp án

Bài 1

1. Space tourism - D. Du lịch không gian

2. Regulatory oversight - G. Giám sát quy định

3. Commercialization of space - H. Thương mại hóa không gian

4. Safety standards - C. Tiêu chuẩn an toàn

5. Exploratory spirit - J. Tinh thần khám phá

6. Resource monopolization - F. Độc quyền tài nguyên

7. Spacecraft launching - O. Việc phóng tàu vũ trụ

8. Satellite technology - N. Công nghệ vệ tinh

9. Asteroids monitoring - B. Giám sát tiểu hành tinh

10. Extraterrestrial life - A. Sự sống ngoài Trái đất

11. Habitable planets - E. Các hành tinh có thể sinh sống

12. Technological by-products - M. Sản phẩm phụ công nghệ

13. Space debris - I. Rác vũ trụ

14. National prestige - K. Danh tiếng quốc gia

15. Resource expenditure - L. Chi tiêu nguồn lực

Bài 2

1. space industry - Ngành công nghiệp không gian

2. reusable rockets - Tên lửa tái sử dụng

3. public scrutiny - Sự quan sát công khai

4. private investment - Đầu tư tư nhân

5. wealthy entities - Các thực thể giàu có

6. Profit-oriented companies - Các công ty hướng tới lợi nhuận

7. human costs - Những tổn thất về mặt con người

8. government resources - Nguồn lực của chính phủ

Bài 3

Outline gợi ý:

I. Introduction

A. Briefly introduce space exploration as a topic of debate

B. Mention the two opposing perspectives on space exploration

C. State the purpose of the essay

II. Body Paragraph 1: Benefits of Space Exploration

A. Present the perspective of proponents of space exploration

B. Discuss technological advancements derived from space missions

C. Highlight the potential for discovering new resources and habitable planets

D. Mention the contribution to understanding Earth's climate and environmental changes

III. Body Paragraph 2: Criticisms of Space Exploration

A. Present the perspective of critics of space exploration

B. Discuss the argument of exorbitant costs and resource allocation

C. Highlight the pressing issues on Earth, such as poverty and climate change

D. Mention the negative environmental implications of space missions

IV. Conclusion

A. Reiterate the stance of the writer supporting space exploration

B. Emphasize the necessity of space exploration despite Earth's challenges

C. Advocate for a balanced approach that addresses both space exploration and terrestrial issues

D. Conclude by highlighting the potential benefits of space exploration in solving terrestrial challenges

Bài mẫu tham khảo

Space exploration, a fascinating realm of human endeavour, has been a matter of debate in terms of its practical implications and its considerable resource expenditure. While some hail it as a means to unearth solutions for Earth's critical issues, others view it as a misallocation of resources that could otherwise be directed towards terrestrial challenges. I intend to discuss both perspectives before revealing my stance on the matter.

Proponents of space exploration argue that its benefits are multifaceted. Firstly, many technological advancements, such as satellite communication and GPS systems, have been direct by-products of space missions, greatly enhancing our everyday lives. Secondly, as our planet's resources are finite, the exploration of space could potentially lead us to new resources, even habitable planets, ensuring the survival of the human race in the long run. Furthermore, the study of outer space and other celestial bodies contributes to our understanding of Earth's climate and environmental changes, potentially offering solutions to combat global warming.

Contrarily, critics contend that the exorbitant costs associated with space exploration could be better utilised to address more immediate concerns on Earth. They argue that issues such as poverty, famine, and climate change require immediate attention and resource allocation. It is indeed true that the billions of dollars spent on building and launching spacecraft could be invested in healthcare, education, and sustainable technologies, arguably having a more direct impact on human welfare. Critics also point out that space missions can have negative environmental implications, such as space debris polluting the Earth's orbit.

Despite the validity of these counterarguments, I align myself with the former viewpoint. While acknowledging the pressing issues on Earth, I believe space exploration is not a mere luxury, but a necessity. Space research often leads to groundbreaking technology that can profoundly impact life on Earth. For instance, climate monitoring satellites help us understand and mitigate the effects of climate change. Moreover, the prospect of extraterrestrial colonization could be an insurance policy against a global catastrophe.

To conclude, it is crucial to strike a balance. While we continue to explore the cosmos, pushing the boundaries of human knowledge and innovation, we should not lose sight of the pressing issues on our home planet. In the grand scheme, the benefits gained from space exploration can offer unparalleled advantages, potentially solving some of our most profound terrestrial challenges. However, this should not exempt us from our responsibilities towards immediate global issues that also warrant attention and resource allocation.

Tìm hiểu thêm:

• Làm thế nào để sửa lỗi ngữ pháp tiếng Anh khi liệt kê trong IELTS Writing?

• Lỗi tuyệt đối hoá và cách tránh khi làm IELTS writing task 2

Mẫu tham khảo cho các bài luận trong bài viết này. 

1. Question: “Many argue that space exploration is a necessity for the progression of human knowledge and technological advancement. To what extent do you agree or disagree?”

The assertion that space exploration is indispensable for the advancement of human knowledge and technology is a point of view that I am in complete agreement with. While some argue that the resources committed to space exploration could be better allocated to issues on our own planet, I believe the benefits of space exploration are innumerable, outweighing its perceived drawbacks.

Firstly, human curiosity and the desire for knowledge are fundamental aspects of our nature. Space exploration provides a platform to answer fundamental questions about our universe and our existence. It enables us to understand phenomena such as black holes, supernovae, and even the origins of our universe - information that could have profound implications on our perception of life and existence.

Secondly, space exploration propels technological advancements. Many innovations we use daily, such as global positioning systems (GPS), weather forecasting, and even advancements in medical imaging, can trace their origins to technology developed for space exploration. It pushes the boundaries of what is technologically possible, often leading to spin-off technologies that have significant impacts on other sectors.

Additionally, exploring outer space could potentially mitigate existential risks. For example, monitoring asteroids and developing asteroid deflection technology could prevent a catastrophic event similar to what the dinosaurs encountered. Furthermore, should Earth become uninhabitable due to reasons like extreme climate change or nuclear warfare, having a backup plan, like colonising Mars, might be the key to the survival of the human race.

However, it is worth noting that while space exploration brings significant benefits, it is also a venture that requires colossal financial investment, not to mention the potential for loss of life, as evidenced by tragic incidents like the Space Shuttle Challenger disaster. This has led some to argue that these resources could be better spent addressing more pressing earthly issues, such as poverty or climate change.

While this argument has its merits, I maintain that space exploration and improving conditions on Earth are not mutually exclusive. Investment in space technologies can drive economic growth, creating jobs and driving advancements in sectors such as engineering, manufacturing, and science education. It can also lead to advancements that can help address environmental issues, such as improving climate modelling to better understand and combat climate change.

In conclusion, although space exploration entails significant costs, I strongly agree that it is a necessity for the progression of human knowledge and technology. It satisfies our innate curiosity, drives technological advancements with far-reaching impacts, and could potentially safeguard the future survival of humanity. Therefore, space exploration deserves continued investment and development.

2. Question: "Some people feel that the cost of space exploration is far too high for the benefits it brings while others argue that space programmes should continue no matter what the cost. Discuss both sides and give your opinion?"

The debate surrounding the expenditure on space exploration and the benefits it yields is an ongoing one. Critics argue that the funds devoted to such projects could be better spent elsewhere, while proponents believe that the benefits, tangible and intangible, justify the expense. Herein, I aim to present both sides before expressing my perspective.

Those who question the vast amounts of money spent on space exploration often highlight urgent terrestrial issues requiring attention and resources. They argue that with prevalent issues like poverty, hunger, lack of education, and healthcare inequities plaguing various parts of the world, it seems unreasonable to spend billions on space research. The expense of sending a single mission to Mars, for example, could fund numerous schools, hospitals, or other critical infrastructure, yielding more immediate benefits for society.

On the other hand, advocates of space exploration point out that the advancements and knowledge we have gained from space research are priceless. Technological innovations arising from space programmes, such as GPS, weather forecasting, and various medical technologies, have revolutionized our daily lives. Moreover, space exploration fosters international collaboration, fuels economies through job creation, and inspires future generations of scientists and engineers. Additionally, space exploration offers an avenue for humankind to prepare for existential threats, such as potential asteroid collisions or the long-term survival of the human race as Earth's resources dwindle.

In my opinion, both viewpoints have merit. Indeed, we cannot ignore the immediate challenges faced by humanity, and the need for investment in health, education, and poverty reduction is unarguable. However, I believe that space exploration is not merely a drain on resources. Instead, it is an investment that has the potential for substantial long-term benefits.

Space exploration can lead to technological breakthroughs that could revolutionize our world, just as the Internet or mobile technology has. It can also provide solutions to global challenges. For instance, the technology used for Mars rovers could be adapted for remote or autonomous monitoring of environmental changes or disaster responses on Earth.

Moreover, from a broader perspective, space exploration satiates the innate human desire to explore and understand our place in the universe. This curiosity, coupled with the challenges space exploration poses, drives innovation, fuels economies, and inspires future generations.

In conclusion, while the costs associated with space exploration are significant, I believe they are justified when considering the potential benefits and advancements it offers. It is crucial, however, to strike a balance, ensuring that spending on space exploration does not come at the expense of addressing pressing issues on our planet.

3. Question: "Recently, there has been a significant increase in private investment in space exploration. Is this a positive or a negative development?"

The recent surge in private investment in space exploration, with companies such as SpaceX and Blue Origin leading the charge, has certainly altered the landscape of the space industry. There are compelling arguments for considering this as both a positive and negative development, but overall, I am inclined to view this trend as a beneficial change.

The increased investment by private entities into space exploration, in my opinion, is predominantly a positive development. Primarily, it has led to increased competition, which drives innovation and efficiency. Notably, SpaceX has revolutionized space travel with reusable rockets, drastically cutting costs and making space more accessible. Furthermore, these private firms are also bringing in fresh perspectives and dynamism, often willing to take calculated risks that government agencies might avoid due to bureaucratic red tape or public scrutiny. This has led to ambitious projects like planning manned missions to Mars, which can spur technological advancements and expand the boundaries of human knowledge.

Moreover, private investment frees up government resources, allowing them to focus on deep space exploration and scientific research, while private companies can cater to commercial and tourism aspects. This can lead to a symbiotic relationship, where government agencies and private firms each play to their strengths, benefiting space exploration as a whole.

However, there are valid concerns that make this trend potentially negative. One issue is the possibility of space becoming the 'Wild West' of the future, with private companies vying for resources and territories without proper regulatory oversight. There's a risk that space, the shared heritage of humanity, could be monopolized by a few wealthy entities.

Additionally, commercialization could potentially detract from the scientific and exploratory spirit of space missions. Profit-oriented companies may prioritize lucrative projects over those that enhance scientific understanding but offer little monetary return.

Lastly, while private firms are pushing boundaries, their risk-taking can also result in failures with substantial financial and human costs. Therefore, adequate safety standards and regulatory measures are essential to ensure the responsible conduct of these private entities.

In conclusion, the surge in private investment in space exploration has potential benefits such as driving innovation and freeing up government resources. However, it also raises concerns around space's commercialization and the lack of regulatory oversight. Thus, while I view this development as positive, it is critical to establish and enforce international regulations to ensure space remains a frontier for exploration and knowledge enhancement, not a battleground for resource monopolization.

4. Question: "The exploration of space requires a substantial allocation of resources and brings about potential risks but also may lead to invaluable scientific discoveries and technological advancement. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?"

The exploration of space, despite requiring significant resources and being fraught with potential risks, can yield exceptional benefits in the form of scientific discoveries and technological advancements. Upon careful consideration, I am inclined to argue that the advantages of space exploration indeed outweigh the disadvantages.

Undeniably, the most significant disadvantage of space exploration is the tremendous financial cost. Launching spacecraft and maintaining space missions requires a colossal investment that could arguably be utilized for more immediate terrestrial issues like healthcare, education, or poverty eradication. Furthermore, space exploration entails potential risks, including loss of human life, as tragically exemplified by the Space Shuttle Challenger disaster.

However, the benefits of space exploration are numerous and far-reaching. Firstly, space exploration leads to invaluable scientific discoveries. By exploring outer space, we have gained insight into our planet, the solar system, and the vast universe beyond it. Such exploration satiates our inherent curiosity, enriches our understanding of the universe, and may even lead to the discovery of extraterrestrial life.

Secondly, technological advancements derived from space exploration have significant impacts on various sectors. The development of satellite technology, for instance, has revolutionized communication, weather forecasting, and navigation systems on Earth. Furthermore, technology designed for space missions has often found applications in other fields, such as medical imaging and disaster management.

In addition, space exploration can provide solutions to global existential threats. Monitoring asteroids, for instance, can mitigate the risk of catastrophic impacts. Moreover, the potential of colonizing other planets offers a safeguard for human survival in the long term, given the increasing strain on Earth's resources.

Lastly, space exploration fosters international collaboration and promotes peace. Space missions often involve multiple nations working together, demonstrating that shared scientific goals can transcend political or cultural differences.

In conclusion, while space exploration incurs substantial costs and potential risks, the scientific, technological, and societal benefits it offers are profound and enduring. Therefore, I firmly believe that the advantages of space exploration far outweigh the disadvantages, and it is an endeavor that deserves our continuous commitment.

5. Question: "Some scientists think that there are intelligent life forms on other planets and messages should be sent to contact them. Other scientists think that it is a bad idea and would be dangerous. Discuss both views and give your own opinions."

The prospect of intelligent extraterrestrial life and the idea of making contact with them has long been a topic of scientific debate and popular fascination. While some scientists advocate for reaching out, others caution against potential dangers. In this discussion, I will outline both viewpoints before presenting my personal stance.

Advocates for contacting extraterrestrial life argue that such an endeavour could be the most significant event in human history, fundamentally altering our understanding of the universe. Moreover, if successful, this contact could lead to an exchange of knowledge and technologies that could propel human civilization forward in unprecedented ways. It could potentially solve problems that seem insurmountable today, from resource shortages to curing diseases. Additionally, communicating with a more advanced civilization could provide us with unique insights into our own society, technology, and our potential future paths.

On the other hand, those who argue against contacting extraterrestrial life often reference the potential risks. They point out that history on Earth shows that contact between more and less technologically advanced civilizations often leads to the latter's downfall, as seen in colonization episodes. Extrapolating this to an interstellar scale, they caution that we could inadvertently attract the attention of a hostile alien civilization, leading to catastrophic consequences.

Moreover, they argue that our messages might reveal sensitive information about us, such as our level of technological advancement, which could be used against us. As physicist Stephen Hawking warned, aliens might be "looking for places to conquer and colonize," and thus, making our presence known might be dangerous.

Personally, I share the concerns of those who warn against broadcasting our existence to the cosmos. Given our limited knowledge about the universe and the potential existence of other intelligent life forms, it seems prudent to exercise caution. We cannot predict the intentions or capabilities of extraterrestrial civilizations, and the risks associated with contact could be existential.

However, I also acknowledge the potential benefits of such contact and understand the desire to reach out and explore the universe. Therefore, I believe a balanced approach is needed. This could involve continuing to search for signs of extraterrestrial life, while also developing international agreements and protocols on how, when, and what kind of messages should be sent out into the cosmos.

In conclusion, the issue of contacting extraterrestrial life is complex and multifaceted, with compelling arguments on both sides. Despite the allure of potential scientific and technological advancements, caution is paramount to avoid unforeseen dangers. This topic underscores the importance of international cooperation and thoughtful dialogue in our ongoing quest to understand the universe.

6. Question: “Governments around the world have been spending a significant portion of their budgets on space exploration. What are the reasons, and is this a positive or a negative development?”

The investment of substantial resources into space exploration by governments worldwide is a result of various motivations. Whether it is a positive or negative development is subjective and depends on one's perspective. However, I personally view it as a largely positive undertaking.

Several factors drive governments to allocate a significant portion of their budgets to space exploration. Firstly, space exploration is a matter of national prestige and geopolitical influence. Historically, the space race between the United States and the Soviet Union was as much a demonstration of technological prowess and ideological superiority as it was about scientific curiosity. Today, nations like China and India also view space exploration as a means to assert their emerging global stature.

Secondly, space exploration fuels scientific discovery and technological innovation. The vast expanse of space and its untapped potential stimulate curiosity and inspire breakthroughs. Technologies developed for space missions often find terrestrial applications, from GPS systems to weather forecasting satellites, benefiting societies and economies.

Lastly, the exploration of space is perceived as a form of future-proofing humanity. As resources on Earth become increasingly strained, the search for alternative resources and habitable planets becomes more pressing.

In my opinion, the above reasons make this a predominantly positive development. Scientific discoveries and technological innovations arising from space exploration enrich human knowledge and offer practical benefits. Moreover, the potential long-term rewards of discovering new habitable worlds or sources of resources could be invaluable for the survival of humanity.

Nevertheless, legitimate concerns exist. The financial investment in space exploration is substantial, and skeptics argue that these resources could be more effectively utilized to tackle urgent issues on Earth, such as poverty, healthcare, or climate change. Additionally, the potential militarization and commercialization of space may result in future conflicts and disparities.

Hence, while the substantial allocation of resources to space exploration can be viewed as a positive advancement, it is imperative that it is conducted responsibly, fairly, and with consideration for the immediate needs of our planet. Regulatory frameworks must ensure that space remains a peaceful domain for scientific exploration, rather than becoming a battleground for resources. Moreover, investments in space endeavors should not detract from addressing the pressing socio-economic and environmental challenges on Earth.

To conclude, despite concerns regarding the exorbitant expenses of space exploration and the potential for misuse, the scientific, technological, and long-term survival advantages render it predominantly beneficial, provided it is managed responsibly and does not detract from addressing immediate terrestrial challenges.

Kết luận