Phát triển ý trong viết IELTS bằng cách sử dụng collocations | Chủ đề ô nhiễm trong thành phố

Các đề viết liên quan đến chủ đề này

• The construction of more green spaces is often proposed as a solution to pollution in cities. Do the advantages of this solution outweigh the disadvantages?

• Some people believe that governmental regulation is the only effective way to tackle urban pollution, while others argue that individual actions and choices can also make a significant difference. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.

• The increase of plastic waste is one of the main causes of pollution in many cities. What are other causes of city pollution, and how can this issue be resolved?

• With the technological advancements in industries, pollution levels in cities have risen sharply. Is this a positive or a negative development?

• People in big cities are facing many healthy challenges due to a high level of air pollution. What cause air pollution in big cities? Can you suggest some ways to deal with this situation?

• The noise pollution in cities is on the rise due to increasing urbanization and industrialization. What are the reasons behind this, and what are its effects on city dwellers and the environment?

Các cặp từ liên quan đến chủ đề ô nhiễm trong thành phố

Sơ đồ tư duy

Dưới đây là 2 mind maps mẫu và rất hữu ích đối với các học viên còn gặp vấn đề về phát triển ý. Các ý bao trùm có thể tạo ra câu luận điểm hay bởi tính khái quát của nó, và các ý nó sẽ tạo thành phần luận cứ chặt chẽ và thuyết phục.

Sơ đồ tư duy 1: Ưu và nhược điểm của việc xây dựng thêm không gian xanh và đánh giá xem nó có mang lại nhiều lợi ích hay hại ít hơn.

Sơ đồ tư duy 2: Nguyên nhân gây ra ô nhiễm thành phố (bao gồm chủ yếu rác thải nhựa và một số nguyên nhân phụ khác) và cách giải quyết vấn đề này

Người học hoàn toàn có thể phối hợp các ý trong 2 mind maps trên để giải quyết các dạng bài khác nhau có liên quan.

Bài tập

Ex 2: Fill in the blanks with the appropriate collocation

Adverse effects High decibel sounds Metropolitan cities Public awareness

Quiet zones Urban ecosystems Vehicular traffic

Noise generation Rapid urbanization Well-being concerns

1. _____________ contributes to air pollution and noise pollution in cities.

2. _____________ has led to an increase in population density in many urban areas.

3. The _____________ are characterized by their size, population, and economic activity.

4. _____________ from traffic can have negative impacts on the health of city dwellers.

5. Creating _____________ can provide a peaceful environment for relaxation and contemplation in bustling cities.

6. The loss of green spaces in urban areas has a detrimental effect on _____________.

7. There is a growing need for _____________ about the importance of sustainable living in cities.

8. The _____________ from construction and industrial activities can disrupt the tranquility of urban environments.

9. _____________ of rapid urbanization include increased pollution, overcrowding, and strain on infrastructure.

10. The _____________ of city residents should be taken into account in urban planning and development.

Ex 3: Fill in the appropriate collocations in the blanks

urban pollution individual responsibility stringent environmental laws government regulation green infrastructure reduction of pollution conscious decisions pollution control conducive environments

Urban pollution has become a growing concern worldwide, with increasing emphasis on effective measures to address this issue. There is a popular debate about whether (1)_______________ is the sole solution or individual contributions can also substantially impact the (2)_______________. I believe both play indispensable roles in combatting this environmental crisis.

On the one hand, government regulation is crucial for managing urban pollution at a macro level. For instance, governments can establish and enforce (3)_______________ to limit emissions from factories, encourage cleaner forms of transportation, and promote recycling. They have the power to initiate large-scale projects such as upgrading public transport, implementing renewable energy sources, and investing in (4)_______________. For example, the government-led Clean Air Act in the UK has significantly reduced levels of air pollution over the past decades.

However, to argue that government intervention alone can effectively curb pollution overlooks the role of (5)_______________. Every citizen contributes to pollution in various ways, such as household waste generation, vehicle usage, and energy consumption. Thus, making more environmentally (6)_______________ in our daily lives, like recycling, reducing energy usage, and using public transportation or carpooling, can collectively have a substantial impact. Individual actions can also inspire others to adopt similar practices, creating a ripple effect that amplifies the overall impact on pollution reduction.

In my view, while government regulations are vital in setting a framework for (7)_______________, it is the collective action of individuals that can bring about substantial change. Governments can create (8)_______________ for reducing pollution, but without the active participation and cooperation of their citizens, such initiatives may fall short of achieving their intended objectives.

In conclusion, both government regulations and individual actions play critical roles in tackling (9)_______________. It is through the synergy of these efforts that the issue can be effectively addressed, and healthier, more sustainable urban environments can be created. As such, neither approach should be overlooked in our fight against pollution.

Ex 4: Create an outline and write a comprehensive answer for this topic. Write a minimum of 250 words.

Rapid urbanization has led to an increase in air pollution in many metropolitan cities. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Đáp án

Bài 1

1. Absorbing carbon dioxide - F. Hấp thụ carbon dioxide

2. Persistent exposure - C. Sự tiếp xúc liên tục

3. Vehicular traffic - I. Giao thông xe cộ

4. Psychological well-being - J. Sức khỏe tâm lý

5. Housing demand - B. Nhu cầu về nhà ở

6. Issue resolution - E. Phương pháp giải quyết vấn đề

7. Infrastructural expansions - H. Sự mở rộng cơ sở hạ tầng

8. Detrimental effects - G. Các hiệu ứng bất lợi

9. Extensive construction - K. Xây dựng mở rộng

10. Harmful pollutants - L. Chất ô nhiễm gây hại

11. Urban residents = Urban dwellers - D. Khu dân cư đô thị

12. Industrialization effects - A. Hiệu ứng của công nghiệp hóa

13. Sustainable cities - M. Các thành phố bền vững

Bài 2

1. Vehicular traffic contributes to air pollution and noise pollution in cities.

2. Rapid urbanization has led to an increase in population density in many urban areas.

3. The metropolitan cities are characterized by their size, population, and economic activity.

4. High decibel sounds from traffic can have negative impacts on the health of city dwellers.

5. Creating quiet zones can provide a peaceful environment for relaxation and contemplation in bustling cities.

6. The loss of green spaces in urban areas has a detrimental effect on urban ecosystems.

7. There is a growing need for public awareness about the importance of sustainable living in cities.

8. Noise generation from construction and industrial activities can disrupt the tranquility of urban environments.

9. Adverse effects of rapid urbanization include increased pollution, overcrowding, and strain on infrastructure.

10. The well-being concerns of city residents should be taken into account in urban planning and development.

Bài 3

1. government regulation

2. reduction of pollution

3. stringent environmental laws

4. green infrastructure

5. individual responsibility

6. conscious decisions

7. pollution control

8. conducive environments

9. urban pollution

Bài 4

Outline gợi ý:

I. Introduction

Introduce the topic of rapid urbanization and its connection to air pollution in metropolitan cities.

Present the statement to be discussed: "Rapid urbanization has led to an increase in air pollution in many metropolitan cities."

Provide a thesis statement indicating the writer's stance on the statement.

II. Body Paragraph 1

Present the first supporting point in favor of the statement.

Discuss the relationship between rapid urbanization and industrial development.

Explain how industries in rapidly expanding cities release harmful pollutants into the atmosphere.

Provide specific examples and evidence to illustrate the impact of industrial emissions on air quality.

III. Body Paragraph 2

Present the second supporting point in favor of the statement.

Discuss the correlation between rapid urbanization and increased vehicular traffic.

Explain how expanding cities lead to a higher demand for personal and commercial vehicles, resulting in increased carbon emissions.

Provide specific examples and evidence to demonstrate the connection between urbanization, population growth, and traffic-related pollution.

IV. Conclusion

Summarize the main points discussed in the body paragraphs.

Restate the thesis statement and indicate the extent of agreement or disagreement with the statement.

Conclude by emphasizing the need for regulatory measures and collective responsibility in addressing air pollution caused by rapid urbanization.

Bài mẫu tham khảo

Urbanization is a significant global phenomenon that has resulted in the rapid growth of cities. This has inevitably led to a substantial rise in air pollution, particularly in metropolitan areas. I completely agree that rapid urbanization is a key contributor to escalating levels of air contamination, given its direct correlation with industrial development, increased vehicular traffic, and the rise in construction activities.

The industrial revolution that accompanies rapid urbanization significantly impacts the quality of air. Cities undergoing rapid expansion often harbor industries that release harmful pollutants, such as carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, and particulate matter, into the atmosphere. These emissions, coupled with poor regulatory oversight, exacerbate the air quality in many urban areas. Beijing, for example, often experiences 'airpocalypse' conditions due to the immense amount of industrial output.

Moreover, burgeoning city populations precipitate a surge in vehicular use. As cities expand and their populations swell, the demand for vehicles for both personal and commercial use multiplies, contributing to an increase in carbon emissions. The perpetual traffic congestion in cities like Los Angeles and Bangkok vividly illustrates this issue, where the constant haze of vehicle exhaust hangs heavy, impairing air quality and causing significant health concerns for residents.

Additionally, the construction sector, integral to urbanization, plays a critical role in polluting city air. Construction activities, including building erecting and road paving, produce large amounts of dust and other pollutants. These activities, often prolonged due to the rapid pace of urban development, consistently degrade air quality over time, as seen in cities like Delhi and Mumbai.

In conclusion, I wholeheartedly agree that rapid urbanization is a predominant factor in escalating air pollution levels in metropolitan areas. The intertwining of urbanization with industrial growth, increased vehicular use, and construction activities ensures that unless significant regulatory measures are enacted, the air quality in these rapidly expanding cities will continue to degrade. The responsibility to enact these changes falls on everyone: governments, corporations, and individuals alike.

Tìm hiểu thêm:

• Làm thế nào để sửa lỗi ngữ pháp tiếng Anh khi liệt kê trong IELTS Writing?

• Lỗi tuyệt đối hoá và cách tránh khi làm IELTS writing task 2

Mẫu tham khảo cho các bài luận trong bài viết này

1. Question: "The construction of more green spaces is often proposed as a solution to pollution in cities. Do the advantages of this solution outweigh the disadvantages?"

Answer:

Green spaces are often hailed as a panacea for urban pollution. By cultivating areas of vegetation in our concrete jungles, it is suggested that we can effectively reduce pollution and enhance the overall quality of urban life. In my perspective, the advantages of incorporating more green spaces in urban areas vastly outweigh the potential disadvantages.

Green spaces act as the lungs of cities, absorbing carbon dioxide and releasing oxygen. They can significantly reduce pollution levels, making cities healthier and more pleasant places to reside. Moreover, trees and plants can also help to filter harmful pollutants from the air and reduce temperatures through the process of transpiration. For instance, it has been reported that in Madrid, a city known for its numerous parks, green spaces absorb around two-thirds of the carbon dioxide produced by urban traffic.

Additionally, green spaces are not only beneficial for environmental reasons, but they also serve as essential recreational areas contributing to the psychological well-being of urban dwellers. Having access to green areas allows for outdoor physical activities and creates an aesthetic landscape that fosters mental tranquility, thus mitigating urban stress.

However, the creation of green spaces in heavily urbanized environments is not without challenges. For one, space is often at a premium in bustling cities, and there might be more immediate demands for residential, commercial, or infrastructural developments. Furthermore, the maintenance of green spaces is another issue, requiring both financial and human resources.

Despite these challenges, it is important to consider the long-term benefits of green spaces. The environmental, health, and societal gains they offer in terms of pollution reduction, mental health improvement, and community building, far surpass the short-term financial and space-related concerns. Therefore, it is crucial that urban planners prioritize the integration of green spaces in their design strategies.

In conclusion, while acknowledging some of the practical difficulties, I firmly believe that the benefits of constructing more green spaces in cities substantially outweigh the disadvantages. As we plan for the future of urban living, green spaces should play a central role in our visions for healthier and more sustainable cities.

2. Question: "Some people believe that governmental regulation is the only effective way to tackle urban pollution, while others argue that individual actions and choices can also make a significant difference. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion."

Answer:

Urban pollution has become a growing concern worldwide, with increasing emphasis on effective measures to address this issue. There is a popular debate about whether government regulation is the sole solution or individual contributions can also substantially impact the reduction of pollution. I believe both play indispensable roles in combatting this environmental crisis.

On the one hand, government regulation is crucial for managing urban pollution at a macro level. For instance, governments can establish and enforce stringent environmental laws to limit emissions from factories, encourage cleaner forms of transportation, and promote recycling. They have the power to initiate large-scale projects such as upgrading public transport, implementing renewable energy sources, and investing in green infrastructure. For example, the government-led Clean Air Act in the UK has significantly reduced levels of air pollution over the past decades.

However, to argue that government intervention alone can effectively curb pollution overlooks the role of individual responsibility. Every citizen contributes to pollution in various ways, such as household waste generation, vehicle usage, and energy consumption. Thus, making more environmentally conscious decisions in our daily lives, like recycling, reducing energy usage, and using public transportation or carpooling, can collectively have a substantial impact. Individual actions can also inspire others to adopt similar practices, creating a ripple effect that amplifies the overall impact on pollution reduction.

In my view, while government regulations are vital in setting a framework for pollution control, it is the collective action of individuals that can bring about substantial change. Governments can create conducive environments for reducing pollution, but without the active participation and cooperation of their citizens, such initiatives may fall short of achieving their intended objectives.

In conclusion, both government regulations and individual actions play critical roles in tackling urban pollution. It is through the synergy of these efforts that the issue can be effectively addressed, and healthier, more sustainable urban environments can be created. As such, neither approach should be overlooked in our fight against pollution.

3. Question: "The increase of plastic waste is one of the main causes of pollution in many cities. What are other causes of city pollution, and how can this issue be resolved?"

Answer:

The problem of pollution in urban areas is multi-faceted, and while plastic waste indeed contributes significantly to this issue, several other factors also play a part. The resolution of this problem necessitates a comprehensive approach that addresses these various causes.

Among the leading causes of city pollution, vehicular emissions stand prominent. The heavy reliance on automobiles, especially those running on fossil fuels, results in the release of copious amounts of harmful pollutants into the atmosphere. Industrial activities, particularly in cities with a high concentration of manufacturing facilities, are another major source of pollution, releasing not just air pollutants but also chemical waste that contaminates water bodies. Additionally, construction activities contribute to dust and noise pollution, while improper waste disposal exacerbates land and water pollution.

To address this multifarious issue, a holistic approach is needed. Firstly, more stringent regulations on industrial emissions and waste disposal should be implemented and strictly enforced. This could involve mandating cleaner production processes, encouraging waste reduction and recycling, and imposing penalties for violations.

Secondly, promoting sustainable transportation is crucial. This can be achieved through investing in public transportation systems to reduce the number of private vehicles on the road, encouraging the use of electric or hybrid vehicles by providing incentives, and creating infrastructure that supports walking and cycling.

Thirdly, effective waste management systems need to be put in place. For instance, implementing robust recycling programs and promoting a circular economy can significantly reduce waste, including plastic. Public awareness campaigns about the importance of recycling and reducing waste can also play a vital role in changing people's attitudes and behaviors.

Lastly, urban planning that incorporates green spaces can help mitigate pollution by providing areas for water absorption and air purification. Green spaces also have the added benefit of improving the aesthetic of cities and the mental well-being of their inhabitants.

In conclusion, while the issue of city pollution is complex and multifaceted, it is not insurmountable. Through a combination of regulatory measures, sustainable practices, effective waste management, and green urban planning, it is possible to create cleaner, healthier, and more sustainable cities.

4. Question: "With the technological advancements in industries, pollution levels in cities have risen sharply. Is this a positive or a negative development?"

Answer:

The impact of technological advancements in industries on pollution levels in cities is indeed a critical subject. While these advancements have undoubtedly driven economic growth and societal progress, their contribution to increased pollution is a negative development that warrants serious consideration.

The exponential growth in industrialization fueled by technological advancements has led to an increased output of goods, facilitating greater consumption and contributing to improved living standards. Additionally, the rise of technology has revolutionized many sectors, from manufacturing to logistics, fostering efficiency, reducing costs, and promoting global trade.

However, these benefits have been accompanied by a significant downside - the rise in pollution levels. Increased industrial activity has led to a surge in the emission of greenhouse gases and harmful particulates. The unchecked use of fossil fuels, often the primary energy source for these industries, is a significant contributor to air pollution. Moreover, the manufacturing process in many industries generates large quantities of waste, often disposed of improperly, leading to water and soil contamination. The high energy demand of these industries also contributes to noise pollution in many cities.

Therefore, while technological advancements in industries have undoubtedly yielded benefits, the associated increase in pollution can't be seen as a positive development. This situation calls for a balanced approach that harnesses the power of technological progress while mitigating its detrimental environmental impacts.

Industries should adopt cleaner and more sustainable technologies to minimize pollution. Regulations and incentives can play a crucial role in encouraging industries to adopt green practices. These could include renewable energy sources, energy-efficient machinery, waste reduction techniques, and more effective waste management systems. It's also important to foster innovation that not only focuses on economic profits but also on environmental sustainability.

In conclusion, while technological advancements have propelled industrial growth and economic progress, the resulting surge in pollution levels represents a significant negative development. To reconcile economic growth with environmental sustainability, industries must adopt cleaner technologies and more sustainable practices.

5. Question: "People in big cities are facing many healthy challenges due to a high level of air pollution. What causes air pollution in big cities? Can you suggest some ways to deal with this situation?"

Answer:

The prevalence of health issues in populous urban centers due to air pollution is an alarming concern. There are several contributing factors to air pollution in cities, and addressing this issue requires a comprehensive strategy encompassing governmental policies, technological advancements, and individual behavioral changes.

Air pollution in cities primarily emanates from a multitude of sources. The burning of fossil fuels for transportation, heating, and power generation is the most significant contributor, leading to the emission of harmful substances such as carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, and particulate matter. Industrial activities, construction projects, waste disposal, and other human activities add to the problem. Furthermore, geographical and weather conditions can exacerbate the situation by trapping pollutants close to the ground, especially in densely-populated urban areas.

Addressing the problem of urban air pollution requires a multifaceted approach. At the governmental level, implementing stricter emission standards for vehicles and industries, investing in renewable energy sources, and promoting public transportation and cycling can substantially reduce the emission of pollutants. Urban planning also plays a crucial role, with the development of green spaces and zoning laws to separate industrial activities from residential areas contributing to cleaner air.

Technological advancements can contribute significantly to curbing air pollution. The development and adoption of cleaner technologies, such as electric vehicles and energy-efficient appliances, can help reduce the reliance on fossil fuels. Moreover, innovations in air purification technology can help cleanse the atmosphere within urban environments.

Lastly, individual actions can make a significant difference. Encouraging behaviors like reducing car usage, recycling, and minimizing waste can contribute to lessening pollution levels. Raising public awareness about the consequences of air pollution and the steps each person can take to mitigate it is crucial.

In conclusion, air pollution in cities, caused mainly by the burning of fossil fuels and industrial activities, poses severe health risks. A concerted effort involving governmental policies, technological advancements, and individual actions is necessary to alleviate this pressing problem.

6. Question: "The noise pollution in cities is on the rise due to increasing urbanization and industrialization. What are the reasons behind this, and what are its effects on city dwellers and the environment?"

Answer:

Noise pollution in cities has indeed escalated with increased urbanization and industrialization. This growing concern has multiple origins and effects, which detrimentally impact the well-being of both urban residents and the broader environment.

The primary reason for escalating noise pollution is the rapid growth of urban populations and consequent infrastructural expansions. This situation results in an increased demand for housing, roads, and services, leading to extensive construction activities. These activities generate significant noise, further amplified by the echo within concrete jungles. Another major contributor to noise pollution is vehicular traffic, whose incessant honking and engine noise significantly elevate sound levels. Industrial processes, public events, and the widespread use of loudspeakers are other noteworthy sources.

The implications of such noise pollution are multifarious and distressing. At the individual level, it adversely affects human health and well-being. Persistent exposure to high decibel sounds leads to stress, insomnia, and auditory issues like tinnitus or even hearing loss. It hinders concentration, thereby reducing productivity and learning capabilities.

For the broader environment, noise pollution disrupts the natural cycles of urban wildlife. Animals, particularly birds, face disorientation due to loud urban noise, affecting their communication, reproductive, and survival behaviors. This disruption in turn impacts the biodiversity of urban ecosystems.

Addressing this issue requires a multifaceted approach. Urban planning and regulations should concentrate on reducing noise generation at its source, including enforcing noise limits at construction sites and public areas, and regulating vehicular noise through routine checks. Encouraging the use of quieter equipment, soundproofing buildings, and establishing 'quiet zones' within cities can also aid in mitigating noise pollution.

Educational initiatives aimed at raising public awareness about the harmful effects of noise pollution and their role in alleviating it could prove effective. Additionally, further investigation is necessary to better comprehend the scope and consequences of urban noise pollution and to devise innovative solutions to combat it.

In summary, the escalation of noise pollution in urban areas due to rapid urbanization and industrial expansion poses significant risks to human health and the environment. A holistic approach involving regulatory measures, educational campaigns, and research endeavors is imperative to address this issue.

Kết luận